2004 Cayenne Turbo VS 2008 FX50S

Rolling 40km/h............................................

My cousin and him were both super shocked :P I guess I beat him with my driving.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• cayenne turbo
• porsche
• fx50s
• fx
• 2004 cayenne turbo
• cayenne
• porsche cayenne turbo

[wesworr81]

@jebaker1121 Regardless, there are really only a handful of SUV's quicker than the FX50 that I have already mentioned and they all have much more hp because the FX is under 5000lbs. Of course there are plenty of cars quicker but SUV's only and handful. Anyway you look at it though, The FX50 will run low to 5 seconds flat and a mid 13 second quarter mile at 105+ mph which for a 4700 lb SUV is just fun and enertaining no matter what. If you have an FX50 enjoy, good times.

[wesworr81]

@jebaker1121 You are right, the video was so dark I didn't pay close attention.I looked at the door panel this time and it is the Cayenne Turbo. But ultimately this comes down to drivers because if it is a 2004 Turbo as stated the FX would out run it by a few ticks to 60 and through the quarter mile but just only, as in a couple tenths of a sec but if the FX driver didnt floor it completely or started off in the wrong gear and had to kick down that could have gave the turbo the edge

[jebaker1121]

@wesworr81 you're wrong. The filming car is the Cayenne, which beat the FX50. I own an FX50; I know what the specs are. he says "This is the FX50" in the video because he is describing the car they are racing. The FX50 will lose to most of the other 'sport-luxury' suvs out there because of its lack of horsepower. It's just as fast to 60mph but after that it's a different story.

[wesworr81]

@jebaker1121 Actually the SUV that won was the FX50s which doesnt have a turbo. 5.0 liter V8 all motor. 390hp and a 7 speed transmission. The 04' Cayenne Turbo from this video is 450hp and these 2 do not even weigh close to the same. The FX has a curb weight of about 4700 lbs. The Cayenne is closer to 5600 lbs. That is why the FX is faster than alot of Suvs even though it has less hp. It is better geared and weighs substantially less.

[jebaker1121]

lol "he got served" what a loser.... the car has 100 more HP with a turbo, obviously its going to win since they weigh almost the same.

"I'm going to race my civic with a turbo vs my friend with a scion tc with no turbo.....who will win"

dumbasses with nice cars.

[chitoe69]

Listen its 390 fx 50 an 480 cayenne turbo. an about the same weight of course the cayenne is going to win. BUT. The Fx 50 cost around 55 k fully loaded and the cayenne turbo 95 K. Also the Infiniti has way more luxury an design. Nice race by the way. Cant compare cars when one is 40 k more. Think about it

[mickey20009]

But u did beat the x6 v8 right?

But all the videos I've seen the x6 v8 has won, maybe they didn't have the 20hp advantage that u do.

Btw, don't get me wrong I am not some1 who looks for people only to race.

I am looking for an overall good car, with reliability and rear visibility with comfort and no engine issues and best built quality.

[mickey20009]

Have u ever tried to race a x6 v8 cayenne turbo and won at speeds of 140km to 160 with ur fx50s?

Because this other owner says he has, but he also has an extra 20hp that u dont.

Can u also tell me how comfortable is the fx50s, I keep reading about stiff ride, bad rear visibility which the x6 also has.

I don't want to choose a bad car n regret it for 3 to 4 years.

[Futileuae]

I tried with the X6 //M

I have no chance with it, it beat me by a long shot but I wouldnt be surprised because it's using M power and it had 555 HP with over 700 f.toque

If i wanna drag race someone i will try with someone my own size cuz the FX50s has no turbos or super or anything like that ... and with that it's powerful ... if i just add a super ill beat the M power X6

[FJSyria]

halla

i jst wanted to ask u abt the borla exhaust if it is specialy for the fx or u have to change some stuff in

and plz if u can help me and give some info abt ur filters :D