Shroud:Part 1/8 Face of Jesus Part 1/8

This is a small hidden face in the Shroud of Turin. Its Jesus' face. He looks just like Garth Brooks. Leave comments, see my other clips on the Shroud at TIMECLOCK 232, POST A COMMENT TO SHOW YOUR DEEP FAITH Roman chapter 1 verse 20 Ever since God created the world, his invisible qualities, both his eternal power and his divine nature, have been clearly seen; they are precieved in the things that God has made.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Shroud
• of
• Turin
• Jesus
• Bible
• Angels
• Holy
• Hidden
• God
• Burial
• cloth
• face
• mandillion
• cross
• Covenant
• glory
• shakina
• Throne
• image
• odesa
• church
• miracle

[ScientistALRIII]

The shroud of Turin is actually containing information about YAHUSHUA body. Yes, His face can be reconstructed from Shroud of Turin. Actually, it is already done. The question whether this information from the Shroud of Turin could be used by evil, for example for creation of the image of the Beast; also DNA can be used, is another thing...

And by the way, it seems that Shroud of Turin contain NOT ONLY information about the YAHUSHUA body: /watch?v=_kgiBSkE3dw

Regards.

[JetpackNinjaDinosaur]

@sned10000

I can admit that the shroud could be authentic but jumping to the conclusion that it was jesus christ, son of god is a leap of faith no one can make without being fallacious.

The shroud could've been forged using a real human body in the middle ages from someone who knew better than the artists of that period. Or the shroud could have been from a legitimate Palestinian crucifixion from someone other than Jesus.

[sned10000]

@JetpackNinjaDinosaur If you think its a fake, then how did the forger know that jesus was nailed through the wrists and not the palms? (depicted in all the artwork of the crucifixtion) The pollens prove that the shroud has been in the middle east somtime in its history. The pray codex has the same burn marks as the shroud. The fabric shows a herringbone pattern, identical to the weaving pattern of the Shroud of Turin. Its most likely that the codex copied the shroud.

[sned10000]

@JetpackNinjaDinosaur This is a link to the scientific journals done on the shroud.

"shroud(dot)com/library.htm"

The Garlaschelli method was not plausible. He suggested the use of red ochre (iron oxide) Its been confirmed, iron was not the chemical that created the image. A link to the journal

"shroud(dot)com/pdfs/soonsresp­onse.pdf"

A link to the 3d encoding

"en.wikipedia(dot)org/wiki/Shr­oud_of_Turin#Image_analysis"

The wounds on the shroud are 100% consistent with the gospels

[JetpackNinjaDinosaur]

@sned10000

"You will notice that any source you have on the shroud will be some BS from the internet. You're "sources" are just skeptic shite"

You've yet to provide me with any sources, while I however have. I think your criticisms should be directed at yourself for once.

[JetpackNinjaDinosaur]

@sned10000

I did a little more research, your claim that the tests were done on the repaired section only is thoroughly invalid. I found it they took 12 samples from the shroud, 4 from each of the 3 times the test was done.

Additionally the prayer book could have been used to figure out how to properly create a forgery, instead of the prayer book being made to resemble the actual shroud.

Lastly, even if this is a legit shroud, it doesn't make it the shroud of Jesus as it could be any man.

[JetpackNinjaDinosaur]

@sned10000

"There are pollens on the shroud from flowers that grow exclusivly in and around jerusalem."

No, not Jerusalem, Palestine. (2) Palestine is a much larger area that includes the tiny city of Jerusalem. This doesn't prove anything since it can so easily be forged. There is also pollen on it from Europe too.

"That link you sent me of how it was made didn't work. "

Type it in manually. tinyurl(dot)com/turinreproduce­d. change (dot) to . It works.

[JetpackNinjaDinosaur]

@sned10000

Furthermore, the blood on the shroud IS real but it has been shown to be added AFTER the image was produced. (1) Sorry to burst your bubble. Sources will be posted at the end.

"There is 3d data encoded in the shrouds image (no painting or photo has this)."

No there is not. I can't find any data to substantiate this claim so i'm assuming you heard wrong until you bring me a source.

Continued again.

[JetpackNinjaDinosaur]

@sned10000

"All the carbon tests done on the shroud have come from 1 section of the shroud (the repaired section"

This is not a fact and has not been substantiated beyond the claim that about 60% of the entire shroud MAY have been repaired but the problem is until you find a date that matches what you want you can't claim any of it came from the 1st century. The shroud has been tested 3 separate times with 3 separate dates. That should be good enough.

continued.

[sned10000]

@JetpackNinjaDinosaur The pray codex proves that the shroud is older that what the (invalid) carbon 14 tests concluded. Trust me, no one has duplicated the shroud. I studied the shroud as a sub topic at uni for 3 years. I know what im talking about. All my sources are from scientific journals that have passed a peer review (written by mostly atheists) You will notice that any source you have on the shroud will be some BS from the internet. You're "sources" are just skeptic shite