NO GAS Create your own water car hybrid for under $150!

http://rikardoli.centemax.hop.clickbank.net/?tid=G5Y6XTJ2
Did you know that you can convert your car to a water-burning car? You can run your car on water, supplemental to gasoline, to increase your car's fuel efficiency and reduce your fuel costs significantly.

Works on gas or diesel powered cars, vans, trucks, and SUVs. (Not tested on hybrids)

Your car will become at least 40% more fuel efficient and produce cleaner emissions.

Convert your car for the lowest price. Similar conversion kits cost up to $600 and up!

Works with plain tap water. No need for distilled water or special water additives!

We've simplified the process. The steps are easy, and the materials are affordable.

Our easy conversion guide will show you how to use electricity from your car's battery to separate water into a gas called HHO (2 Hydrogen + 1 Oxygen). HHO, also called Brown's Gas or Hydroxy, burns smoothly and provides significant energy - while the end product is just H2O! HHO provides the atomic power of Hydrogen, while maintaining the stability of water.
http://rikardoli.centemax.hop.clickbank.net/?tid=G5Y6XTJ2

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Hydrogen
• Fuel
• Cell
• Stan
• Meyer
• Inventor
• Water
• Car
• Global
• Warming
• CO2
• Greenhouse
• Oil

[Bidmartinlo]

You can use a bycycle to power a car, you can use water to power a car, same with steam, same with metan, solar power... and so on. Of course, we don't do it because the private companies lose money and the government supports them. I am guessing that without that leash we would be in the space era now.

[vartatoosh]

can this system use urine instead of water if yes then it is possible to urinate

in this car and then drive it.

Correct me if I'm wrong

[sasop117]

28 MPG!! fuck that terrable!!! what do you guy in the US drive tanks?!

[johnh887]

The only reason its not on the market is because the GOVERNMENT CANT HAVE CONTROL OF IT AND THEY SURE CANT MAKE NO MONEY ON IT !! Thats why our GOVERNMENT SUCKS !!!!!!!!!

[ThinkStage]

Very cool

To see more innovative videos like this or want to share your own ideas visit ThinkStageDOTcom

[DrMotorDude]

"....and most of it is used for transportation."

Could not be more WRONG! - MOST of it is used to generate electricity in China, India, the Middle East, Europe (recall Germany is shutting down ALL nuclear reactors?) North and South America. And let's look at Africa, Aswan Dam is a good hyro power plant but how many others compared to fossil fuel?

[james3244]

Agreed, good discussion!!

Like Japan is doing, I hope other countries follow suit: They are implementing (in the building code), that all future structures be built with solar power and/or other re-newable energy sources.

Solar, wind and geo-thermal energy are our future.

[mattymuck]

@james3244 Meh, I don't see it as being catastrophic in a long term view. Any form of energy production can have its dangers. Apparently Hydro power was one that has the most common dangers if I remember right. I think Australia will end up building some nuclear plants, unless they decide to use more and more coal I don't see that going down well. I look forward to seeing what happens in the next 20 years or so lol. I am off, Good talk :) discussing our disagreements is the only way we learn ^^

[james3244]

@mattymuck Nuclear power statistically IS quite safe.. but look at Chernobyl and Fukushima. Japan plans for these things and are actually one of the best protected against natural disasters..But that doesn't stop a 9.0 earthquake and a tsunami travelling at 500MPH.. We are seeing the radiation effects all the way over here in North America.. People still can't go back to Chernobyl!!

If the "New Madrid" fault were to go, there would be a few nuclear stations that would be affected.

[mattymuck]

@james3244 hehe what a variety of topics. Nuclear power is statistically quite safe. on the view of a civilisation though, I assume there would always be some survivors of a nuclear war. You would need to destroy the Earth somehow lol and by the time destroying planets was possible you would think other planets would have been colonised.

[james3244]

@mattymuck It would definitely be hard to completely wipe out a civiliZation all by themselves. You are correct in the fact that if we were able to travel the speed of light, the person inside the craft would essentially be ageless.

I am more worried about natural disasters causing nuclear meltdowns than being destroyed by Iran, Russia, or China..

However, China's gonna want their money someday ;)

[mattymuck]

@james3244 hence making our time even more insignificant lol. Although civilisations could destroy themselves or be destroyed naturally before becoming so advanced. Personally I find the idea of a civilisation destroying itself entirely hard to believe.