My Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 analysis...part 2

I wanted to post this a week ago but my computer was being very uncooperative. So better late than never right?

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Harry
• Potter
• and
• the
• Deathly
• Hallows
• Part
• movie
• review
• part
• analysis
• book
• differences
• Hermione
• Granger
• Ron
• Weasley
• Neville
• Longbottom
• Voldemort
• Draco
• Lucious
• Malfoy
• Bellatrix
• Snape
• Gringotts
• Griphook
• backstory
• Dumbledore
• Arianna
• Aberforth
• Grindelwald
• Lupin
• Tonks
• Teddy
• Godfather
• James
• Lily
• Sirius
• Mad
• Eye
• Moody
• death
• off
• screen
• final
• battle
• Dobby
• Kreacher
• Epilogue
• Ginny
• husband
• wife
• children
• Hogwarts
• Horcurxes

[eminem4436]

Don't you know? Ron became a dentist...

[gamingeagle19]

@eminem4436 that would be interesting to see. lol

[dodochipmunk]

No but it's the same situation because Harry is like a celebrity to them. And the part that I'm talking about no one was fighting, it was after the battle was already over and he was just walking around the castle. People were sitting around the injured and some were talking. It just seemed so unnatural that no one would even bother to turn their head at him.

[gamingeagle19]

@dodochipmunk sure next time a friend or family member is lying dead or injured on the ground I'm sure you would leave their side to go talk to the celebrity walking by.

[dodochipmunk]

I thought the movie was terrible. What about the part where Harry is walking around the castle after the fight and also while the war was going on outside and no one is even looking at him? As though their personal conversations were more important than Harry walking around. That would be like going to a Beatles concert and then not noticing Paul McCartney walk by. How was that believable??

[gamingeagle19]

@dodochipmunk are you comparing a concert to a war? People aren't going to stop fighting just because Harry walked by.

[thepad153]

I agree with you on pretty much everything you said. I would add that Harry should have been disguised in part 1 at Bill and Fleur's wedding and in Godric's Hollow. And that Hermione shouldn't have mentioned the word 'horcrux' in front of Griphook in the Lestrange's vault in part 2. And that the circumstances of Snape's being forced out the window in part 2 were completely different from the book which was much better in my opinion.

[yarealpoof]

I thought Snape's story was as faithfully adapted as could have reasonably been expected. Going too indepth with Lily's departure from their friendship probably would have been confusing for the general audience. Same with Kreacher's Tale. Going on about dead Regulus would have felt weird to non-readers. I DO think they should have kept in Dumbledore's story and its resolution at "King's Cross". That was essential and they'd built it up already but they never finished it. Good video.