PALIN CAN'T NAME ANY SUPREME COURT CASES
Uploader Comments (Dividend)
All Comments (30)
-
@ericjon54 Wow, you really need to stop watching Saturday night live my Friend, Sarah Palin never said she could see Russia from her house, it was the SNL Bimbo who said that. You want to see real Media bias, turn on CNN, MSNBC, and all of the liberal channels, there is nothing but media bias there.
-
@hobbyasu u better win this next election republicans because roughly 2.5 million people die every day, 75% of whom are republican, roughly 3.5 million people turn 18 every day, 75% are democrat, the conservative out dated republicans are just about done so squeeze all the juice out u can before its gone, any group of people that are scared of a word like progress shouldnt be ruling anything and with people being more educated they realize that
-
@hobbyasu unfair, she said she can see russia out her window in alaska, the media didnt make her look stupid, shes just stupid, in fairness its obviously possible for a total dumbass to be in office, we proved that with bush, and this media bias thing is ridiculous, the biggest media outlet for politics is fox news and theyre right wing, just republicans acting like theyre victims, poor republicans sitting in their big houses taxing social security to get tax cuts for big bussiness
-
I think this picking on sarah palin is stupid, if you don't like don't watch her, don't edit a video about how you hate her, she may one day be the president, I know I'd have her over the idiot in office now.
-
Why is it the only interviews that show Palin in a negative light are from the same small group of interviewers?
And I can tell half the liberals who watched this just ran off to wikipedia so they could pretend like they could do better.
-
@hobbyasu i never followed palin, sure glad i didnt, nothing was missed..she didnt name any cases at all, thats lame..
-
Oklahoma voters banned Sharia Law (taking into account any court case which uses Islamic system of Sharia Law) in 2010 by 70%. A Federal judge has placed a temporary injunction on the ballot measure to weigh the constitutionality of the rights of the voters versus the rights of the individual according to CNN. GOOGLE “americanthinker sharia law” and click on the “top ten reasons why sharia is bad for all societies” link to see why this is bad.
-
2/2 I want to see you talk back the way Clair Huxtable did, and get slapped across the face consistent with [4:34] of the Qu’ran.That Bill Cosby would be such a card! Enlightenment could not be funnier. I also want Bill’s friends to come over and play some Poker, and you disagree with one of Bill’s friends, and Bill will say, “He’s right, his word is worth twice yours, woman!” consistent with [4.11].
.
Allen West 2012
-
No one touched the stupidity of Katie Couric's Muslim Cosby Show idea far worse than any Palin gaffe.
1/2
Katie, only if you played the Muslim wife version of Clair Huxtable. I want to see you wear a burka during the entire series, because that’s what respectful muslim women do. I want to see lots of scenes where you don’t want sex, and your “Bill Cosby” plows his fields essentially raping you consistent with [2. 223] of the Qu’ran. Damn that’s just slap-stick comedy right there!
-
@hobbyasu What is a msnbc?
One of the most unfair questions that I have ever heard. This question did not ask her to name a Supreme Court case, it asked her to name a case that she disagreed with. She is a Conservative so she would have to go all the way back to the Warren Court to find the big liberal decisions. There is that liberal media bias for you.
hobbyasu 3 years ago
How is that liberal media bias for me? I just named commonly taught court decisions that have been used in schools for decades. Miranda vs. Arizona is a HUGE ruling. It occurred in 1966, just 2 years after Palin was born. Being a conservative is no excuse for ignorance.
Dividend 3 years ago
I agree on Miranda, but you just proved my point. I said all the way back to the Warren Court. Thank you for proving me correct.
hobbyasu 3 years ago
Miranda was just one ruling, there are dozens (if not hundreds more). That doesn't prove you would have to go back that far. The only thing it proves is that we have differing opinions. However, I do thank you for sharing your views on the video, its meant to invoke a response.
Dividend 3 years ago