What is an Epidemiological Study?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,321
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 19, 2008

There are different ways that medical studies are conducted. A common method is called an epidemiological study. Find out how good is the information and what conclusions are possible.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (gchodak1)

  • There are no definite conclusions arrived in many epidemiology studies. However, if valid statistical analyses are performed and with a high degree of power; one can show relationships between,exposure variables,treatments and diseases etc. Nobody would call these conclusions, but they certainly can estimate and suggest much information for further study. Also, if no other information(or studies) available , it is perfectly reasonable to use epidemiological studies for personal health decisions.

  • @AmadeusStatisitician People can do anything they want, BUT, epidemiological studies do not prove cause and effect, which means using those studies to make health decisions can be right and it can be wrong and people should not be misled about the validity.

  • Sorry but no conclusions are justified based on these studies, they are only hypothesis generating.

see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • There is certainly truth in many of the comments posted, but I would like to propose some alternative terminology. Instead of "correct," "conclusion," and "unreliable," consider two major tenets of epidemiological studies and outcomes: association and causality. An statistically significant association can emerge from an incredibly well-designed study, and perhaps be repeated with great success (and thus be reliable), but this does not prove causality.

    

  • This is the job i want.

  • what i learned from this video: epidemiologists are blabbering fools, don't listen to them

  • I don't think anyone here is ACTUALLY arguing. One side is saying you can't come to any conclusion because there is no scientific validation. The other side, agrees, saying however that a 100 to 1 correlation is enough to make a conclusion. Say for instance scientists then take it further and PROVE that eating red meat increases the risk of prostate cancer tremendously. Epidemiology is a science of observation, a tool we all use to survive.

  • Thank you that was very informative! and now that I think of it alot of what I hear are epidemiological studies.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more