DNC Web Ad: Overreacting

DNC Web Ad: Overreacting

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• dnc
• democratic
• national
• committee
• eric
• cantor
• overreacting
• republicans
• economic
• crisis

[Anomaly100]

So, doing nothing is status quo for these guys. Nothing has apparently changed with them. Perhaps when they see our country in complete ruin, it just might occur to him, that maybe, just maybe there's a problem somewhere. THEN they'll come out with a feasible alternative...Nah!

[ReliableInsider]

Right. That's what he's doing. Dealing with all the issues that Bush left unaddressed.

If we stimulate the economy, the economy will wake up and go back to work and the machinery will begin to function again.

The way you pay off the national debt is with a strong economy. The way you pay off a credit card is by going to work.

But we can't pay off the national debt without a strong modern economy. Washington Republicans know this. They're just pretending to be stupid.

I hope.

[shitstepper]

Bush did not Push nothing on the banks. One week Bush says the economy is strong, turns around and says the world is going to crash without a bailout. I have gone back and read everything on that TARP, Bush didn't force nothing. Bush did what the republicans do all the time. Fear Factor. He bailed out AIG saying if no money comes their way, CRASH. Same with the banks, no money come their way, CRASH. Bush made it sound like we were going to be hit with a nuke if bailout didn't happen. FEAR

[ReligulousAoR9]

The Retardicans are on the receiving end of Rush Limbaugh's teabagging.

[Chick6517]

that was fantastic .... haha you have be rolling on the floor right now never thought i would see something that funny hahaha ... HILARIOUS

[LooseLatitude]

So you believe Clinton was the very opposite of a king yet you concede that Clinton has a trait that is synonymous with Kings.

[LooseLatitude]

So you do approve of a one party rule. Where more than half the country has no representation. Interesting the founding fathers called that tyranny.

Did Obama con his supporters?

Did Democrats in the Senate and the House con their supporters?

[LooseLatitude]

"The banks are going to take their vegetables. And they're going to -like- 'em!... Or no desert!" Sounds dictatorial.

But you never addressed the issue. Some banks, who didn't need TARP monies, were forced into taking them. They want to give the monies back but Obama is refusing so he can continue to control them.

"...he's going to sell them as soon as they can function." They didn't have problems functioning before the TARP monies and have been functioning fine since.

Do you approve?

[ReliableInsider]

Having a party that lies constantly go up against a party that tells the truth is not really much of a two-party system.

The debates should be between two good proposals on every issue--not what we have now. The Democrats trying to inform and the Republicans trying to con their own supporters.

[ReliableInsider]

The banks are going to take their vegetables. And they're going to -like- 'em!

Or no dessert!

I said up above that he's going to sell them as soon as they can function. What's the objection?

Hopefully, a second party will emerge some day that isn't just providing corporate welfare for the idle rich among its big contributors, but that actually provides an alternative and that sometimes offers better ideas.

[99kw]

we the people,that means, all americans dems. an reps an ya, you libs too..are no longer in charge of our own economy.that now belongs to the FSB.educate yourselves!!! it is a globalist banker that is now running all firms in this country.April 2, 2009, Now, that is a day that will live in infamy.....

[LooseLatitude]

Wait, the banks in question never wanted the TARP monies. They were doing just fine. They didn't need and didn't want the money but Bush forced it on them.

Obama is refusing to let go of control of these banks. Do you approve?

Are you suggesting one party rule?