Which is better: an HTML site map or XML Sitemap?
Top Comments
All Comments (19)
-
Guys this video made in 2009, and now the situations have changed. Don't blame Matt for this..
-
I think they are of both significance. It will only have to depend on hoe it is used by the user.
-
There are about 12 different types of sitemaps, Google uses the xml version, but all are important.
-
blogger has a gun to my head!
-
For indexability = use sitemaps.xml, .txt for yahoo, bing,google webmaster tools submitting. For usability - use sitemap.html
-
The Webmaster Tools response to a submitted sitemap that reads:
Sitemap is HTML Your Sitemap appears to be an HTML page. Please use a supported sitemap format instead.
I think it's referring to the CONTENT of the file rather than file type. It means theres HTML code inside it, which isn't correct. It's not supposed to be a list of links, it's supposed to be a list of URLs. As mentioned in the video, even a simple text file list of each web page is helpful to Google - and those aren't links.
-
paginate it so that you only show X urls per page. we have one that shows like 10,000 links per page.
-
HTML Sitemaps are not supported by Google Webmasters Tools indeed. It will be great if Matt Cuts show us how to submit a html sitemap to Google crawler.
People pointing guns at webmasters' heads and forcing them to pick between HTML and XML sitemaps is actually a growing problem - I'm glad Matt has the courage to address this issue.
foggiellama 2 years ago 27
Everytime I watch these videos I am impressed at how useful the info is and that a Marketing/pseudo-webmaster can understand. Keep it up!
ComputerRentals 2 years ago 7