Noam Chomsky discusses the events of September 11, 2001

Noam Chomsky discusses the events of September 11, 2001.
For more information visit:
http://www.articulatedissent.com (more)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Noam
• Chomsky
• 911
• wtc
• pentagon
• bush
• bin
• lauden
• cia
• al
• quaeda
• september
• 11

[Surely57]

Thank heavens...a voice of reason.

[Pattonash]

He said it takes energy away from more important issues. You should watch it again my friend.

[italmia]

sir, I don't know about the conspiracy, the why and how of the event. But you cannot be against the laws of physics, explosives thermate findings, huge numbers of testimonies on the explosions, sismic records etc. I am sorry sir you are manipulated or you are manipulating people. There is no need to discuss when a building of more than 400 stories of 80 000 tonnes falls in 11 seconds to the ground. You know laws of physics don't you. I'm very deceived and cautious about you now.

[ElPeruanoUFO]

This has been studied and confirmed about the hoax 911 was but the western media specially in the US don't report it

[111RobinHood]

I respect Noam as an expert on political world issues, but as a human being he is a cold intellectual and definately has no humanitarian qualities. On 9/11conspiracy he just brushes it aside as being irrelevant. What is the death of three thousand people on 9/11! Who cares who is responsible! Please Noam, we all know the Aministration's reluctance and the commission to adequately explain the gross inconsistencies in the commission report! But to you this is irrelevant! People want Truth!

[111RobinHood]

Many experts, foreign diplomats,etc. believe it was an inside job. It is a serious issue to believe that the Administration probably was responsible for 9/11! An American government that talks incessantly to the world through Bush and Obama about justice, liberty, democracy, and human rights, and then for the Administration to be responsible in the murder of its own people is abominable hypocrisy and diabolic. It tears down the fabric of all concepts of morality and he says this is irrelevant?

[111RobinHood]

And are we going to believe that terrorists were responsible for the collapse of the third tower which was not hit by any plane and that too fell at free fall speed which engineers say that that must have been done by demoltion explosives! Even a series of explosions were heard at ground level by firemen and public, which demonstrate charges planted! How were terrorists able to have access to planting charges? No! It was an inside job. And for him to state that 3000 people died is insignificant?

[111RobinHood]

Ok. He's intelligent when it comes to analysing important issues such as poltical power and control in world affairs. But he is unable to say who was responsible for 9/11? There are no proofs linking 9/11 to Al Quaeda or to any terrorists! And there is overwhelming evidence that the commission report does not make sense to independant professional engineers and architects. And you cannot claim that the unavailability of all interceptor jets as being a coincidence! And the evidence for thermate?

[Quankers]

He says much more than that, regardless of whether or not you are capable of comprehending it.

"All he says is, "America bad. Wah! Wah! Wah!" "

[Johnabraytis]

I'd be glad to debate him, but how can you tell when he's awake? And what's to debate? All he says is, "America bad. Wah! Wah! Wah!"  Chomsky has a great future as a Woody Allen impersonator.

[Quankers]

Uranus, eh? I think you ought to debate Chomsky.

[Johnabraytis]

I think Chomsky ought to go back to Uranus.