2004 Election Results Questioned (Steve Freeman)

From KPBS...
"2008 is just around the corner. Already, the field of presidential candidates is growing. We have Richardson, Clinton, Obama, Romney, Hunter, Biden, and Edwards declared. We have at least McCain and Giuliani preparing. There's no incumbent. There's no vice president heir apparent. It's shaping up to be a tough, expensive race with huge stakes. The good news is that it will be decided by the ballot box. But is that system still safe and fair? Can we trust the election results? Author Steve Freeman believes that we cannot. We'll examine his findings and his claim that the way U.S. elections are conducted threatens democracy. "
http://www.kpbs.org/tv/full_focus?id=7358

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 2004
• Election
• Results
• Questioned
• President
• Bush
• George
• W.
• Traitors
• treason
• fascist
• neocon
• PNAC
• project
• new
• American

[jaymzdean]

Either read "Hacked, High Tech Election Theft in America" or get your hands on a copy of the documentary by Bev Harris called "Hacking Democracy". I can't communicate to you in the comments section here what both the book and the documentary reveal so clearly. Do you not find it suspicious that Diebold's (and others) voting-machine software is PROPRIETARY?

[NoGuff]

"There is evidence that it was rigged"

--You mean like the fact that only 5% of soldiers serving in combat got to vote in '06? You mean evidence like that? If you have real evidence, why haven't you brought it to the proper authorities?

[545lljkr]

"Why is there this widespread conspiracy theory that the '00 & '04 elections were fraudulent, but the '06 election is never mentioned? I'll tell you why. Because Liberals believe if Conservatives win an election, it can't be because the majority voted for them, it MUST be due to election fraud. WHINING, CRY-BABY HYPOCRITES!"

There is evidence that it was rigged, I don't give a rat's ass what you think.

[ArkBackPacker]

Accusations are pointless. The facts are clear Computer Programs are easily manipulated paper ballots have gotten the job done in a verifiable manner for two hundred thirty years plus "If it ain't broke don't fix it" As for hanging chads thats just politics. Only about 40% of the population votes now we don't this.

[ArkBackPacker]

Apparently Not

[NoGuff]

"The right to vote should be sacred to ALL Americans"

--It is sacred to me. But I find that Liberals/Democrats scream "election fraud" WHENEVER they lose, not only when they think there's evidence.

[jeanniedean]

Actually, NoGuff--MY 2006 election was stolen. (Sarsota, Florida) I've been following it obsessively/ all the returns from across the country. You can search YOUTUBE/JEANNIE DEAN and find out how...

Also, I'm a registered REPUBLICAN.

The right to vote should be sacred to ALL Americans.

[NoGuff]

Why is there this widespread conspiracy theory that the '00 & '04 elections were fraudulent, but the '06 election is never mentioned? I'll tell you why. Because Liberals believe if Conservatives win an election, it can't be because the majority voted for them, it MUST be due to election fraud. WHINING, CRY-BABY HYPOCRITES!

[NoGuff]

jean - Its good to finally hear some sense from posters, even though Mr Freeman ignores the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, and the official findings of investigative panels, and even John Kerry doesn't believe there was fraud.

"up for an emmy"

--"Inconvenient Truth" won an Oscar, doesn't mean it wasn't full of distortions of the truth.

[jeanniedean]

Hello, NoGuff! No one is implying a Ph.D makes you untouchable or unbiased; but Mr. Freeman's numbers are confirmed and well-sourced. It is good to be skeptical of internet info/ previous poster recommended HACKING DEMOCRACY--up for an emmy for OUTSTANDING INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM...check it out.

[NoGuff]

"STEVEN F. FREEMAN holds a Ph.D"

--So no one with a PhD has ever been wrong? No one with a PhD has ever had an agenda? People who have a PhD don't have political leanings or preferences? Rubbish.

"one of the three most important "censored" stories of 2005."

--Exactly how was it "censored," and by whom?