Nick Di Paolo on plastic surgery

A classic Just For Laughs moment. In his overthe-top frank style, Nick says when you get work done make sure you get all the work done. See Nick host some of todays most hilariously crude comedians at the Nasty Show July 17-18.

Buy Nasty Show tickets now at http://hahaha.com/en/show_detail/108/0/328/

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Nick
• DiPaolo001

[yannelli55]

he's the funniest commentator on TruTV's Dumbest Criminal show

[herbertportillo1]

Dane Cook sucks

[Zlot117]

@herbertportillo1 u suck

[Mistertbones]

We miss him on World's Dumbest!

[cantilever]

@SylvanaForrester I'm not debating you...I'm merely challenging your elitism and baseless arrogance. I do consider myself part 'n' parcel of DiPaolo's demo--but only because I enjoy funny stand-up comedians, not for all the other self-serving and derisory reasons you adduced. Your "hypothesis" remains unproven--but you don't have to acknowledge that. Oh, and here's the last word: UP YOUR NOSE WIT' A RUBBER HOSE, FAGGOT!

[cantilever]

@SylvanaForrester 1. I went to one of their events. Nice people. Don't consider myself a member. 2. I googled your sobriquet--I'm retired; I have the time--and found more evidence to indicate you're a bum-puncher. You can confirm or deny it, of course. 4. I believe--along with Geraldine Ferraro--that his race was a net plus in the election. Not the sole reason for his win, but a contributing factor. 4. Not "proudly"...more "matter-of-factly" (and usually to hypersensitive twits). 5. Yes.

[SylvanaForrester]

@cantilever If that's so, which it appears to be, then I’m not sure why you’re trying to debate me here, since we’re both in agreement that you are DiPaolo’s key demographic. I’m not interested in having the final word, only in proving a theory. Thanks for all your help! The last word is all yours.

[SylvanaForrester]

@cantilever Let me get this straight: you 1. support the tea party, 2. make sweeping, false assertions about other people based on casual observations (e.g., a perusal of my channel has led you to disregard my name and assume I’m both male and gay), 3. you believe that Obama was elected merely because of the color of his skin even though there is no way to empirically verify that racist belief, 4. you proudly throw around homophobic slurs and 5. you think Nick DiPaolo is absolutely hilarious ?

[cantilever]

@SylvanaForrester Exactly what is "sociological reality"? DiPaolo's political commentary reflects his subjective viewpoint of the world. It's no less valid than yours--even though you insist otherwise. And you know somethin' else? It's funny! Again: maybe not to you, because you're a 'mo who doesn't like his politics. Fair enough. You're entitled to your opinion. (BTW, saying something is "beyond debate" reinforces your mammoth solipsism...you don't have the final word on anything...)

[SylvanaForrester]

@cantilever I appreciate that you write well and proofread before posting! DiPaolo is not unfunny to me. His political commentary, however, is laden with racism, sexism and homophobia delivered in a "telling it like it is, political correctness be damned" manner that has zero basis in sociological reality. That, to me, is beyond debate. Also, you can't give a "folks like you" speech complete with its own epithets while criticizing a person for doing the same w/o coming off as a hypocrite.

[cantilever]

@SylvanaForrester Geraldine Ferraro made the same basic point--that Obama's race helped him defeat Clinton in the primary. She was right, and she got fired for speaking the truth. What "point" of yours are you claiming H0VA helped prove...? That DiPaolo's fans are icky, uninformed conservatives? You're making a huge, inductive leap there, based on very flimsy evidence. It hardly approaches "proof"...it's much more proximate to "self-satisfied conjecture." (You're a fag, ain'tcha...?)

[cantilever]

@SylvanaForrester Your Donald Trump "analogy" could have used a few more minutes in the oven. Yikes. And when you say that at least a "handful" of "tea baggers" (signify, brother!) are not racist, you reveal your total ignorance...