Oh, and by the way, if you're going to use ad homieums on me then keep your fucking complaints about my "straw-man" arguments to yourself. I know what correlation and causation is. Causation was proven within two of those studies, but I doubted you had the patience to read that far. Here you are professing yourself an intellect on matters of science ON YOUTUBE! That's laughable and pathetic at best. Stop sniffing your own farts, and keep your self-glamorization to a minimum.
Do you even know what the scientific method is? That does not include "doubting something just because I disagree with it". The scientific method does not involve doubting or disproving established theories. These are multiple studies on the same subject with the same conclusion. If I gave you the most pristine, thought-provoking study you would find some way to discredit because that's easier than admitting you could be wrong.
Look, you're one of those egotistical assholes who will find some reason to deny or discredit anything I give you simply because it does not comply to your bias and agenda. Questioning researchers and studies in one thing. Completely denying there is any truth in them at all is another. What authority do have to do that? I will gladly provide you even more if you're so fucking delusional about it. There are massive amounts of studies that have the same exact conclusion.
There is no "probably" about it. A man doesn't look at a woman and decide to rape her without *ANY* previous thought or fantasy about rape. Again, I'm going to have to find a way to say this in other terms, since you're so stubborn about it.
The idea that fantasy doesn't lead to acting out that fantasy is nonsense. Does fantasizing about a woman you like not lead to sleeping with her? Is there no correlation?
That's your logic in a nut shell. This is *NOT* correlation. You get a science class!
Let me try to get this through your thick skull since you're too much of a whore for conflict to understand. Is there any case of a rapist you know of in which the rapist was not aroused by rape? No. Therefore, fantasy and rape fetish is a cause of rape. Saying it's not is as absurd as saying child fantasy and fetish is not a cause of child molestation. I fucking dare you prove that last statement wrong.
"You believe that they are not sexually aroused by rape or violence?"
I think they are, but I don't see what you imply by that.
"You expect me to agree that a man will rape a woman even though he is not sexually aroused by violence or rape?"
I don't expect your highly dogmatic control-freak personality to agree with anything. Again, I'm not even going to answer this question. Stop making up straw men. Learn the fucking difference between correlation and (reverse) causation.
"So you believe the rapists have no desire to rape a woman? "
You call me a troll? I already explained this. I quote myself. "People who rape will probably fantasize about it. That does not mean that fantasizing about rape actually causes rape." Can't you see how you can't just turn that statement around and still expect it to be the unfounded truth? Learn the difference between correlation and causation and reverse causation. Go get a class in science, please.
No, being a psychologist and having made a lousy study doesn't make you better. You are wrong yet again. Scientific methodology demands we question researchers and there studies and try to find errors, which in your studies were blatantly obvious to any scientist. You would have it that I can just claim full knowledge on Biomedical Sciences, just because I have a degree and wrote an article, regardless of how lousy it may be?
I read your full study and explained carefully why it was wrong. Sorry, but unlike you, I adhere to the scientific method. I don't just read an abstract and say "I'll go with it". If you think that's weaseling out, you'd make a very poor scientist. Yet again, you already demonstrated you were clueless on methodology when you asked me to prove a negative. So it's no wonder that statistics and correlation vs. causation etc. are also strange to you.
Oh, and by the way, if you're going to use ad homieums on me then keep your fucking complaints about my "straw-man" arguments to yourself. I know what correlation and causation is. Causation was proven within two of those studies, but I doubted you had the patience to read that far. Here you are professing yourself an intellect on matters of science ON YOUTUBE! That's laughable and pathetic at best. Stop sniffing your own farts, and keep your self-glamorization to a minimum.
ColibriAnna08 5 months ago
Do you even know what the scientific method is? That does not include "doubting something just because I disagree with it". The scientific method does not involve doubting or disproving established theories. These are multiple studies on the same subject with the same conclusion. If I gave you the most pristine, thought-provoking study you would find some way to discredit because that's easier than admitting you could be wrong.
ColibriAnna08 5 months ago
Look, you're one of those egotistical assholes who will find some reason to deny or discredit anything I give you simply because it does not comply to your bias and agenda. Questioning researchers and studies in one thing. Completely denying there is any truth in them at all is another. What authority do have to do that? I will gladly provide you even more if you're so fucking delusional about it. There are massive amounts of studies that have the same exact conclusion.
ColibriAnna08 5 months ago
There is no "probably" about it. A man doesn't look at a woman and decide to rape her without *ANY* previous thought or fantasy about rape. Again, I'm going to have to find a way to say this in other terms, since you're so stubborn about it.
The idea that fantasy doesn't lead to acting out that fantasy is nonsense. Does fantasizing about a woman you like not lead to sleeping with her? Is there no correlation?
That's your logic in a nut shell. This is *NOT* correlation. You get a science class!
ColibriAnna08 5 months ago
Let me try to get this through your thick skull since you're too much of a whore for conflict to understand. Is there any case of a rapist you know of in which the rapist was not aroused by rape? No. Therefore, fantasy and rape fetish is a cause of rape. Saying it's not is as absurd as saying child fantasy and fetish is not a cause of child molestation. I fucking dare you prove that last statement wrong.
ColibriAnna08 5 months ago
@ColibriAnna08
"You believe that they are not sexually aroused by rape or violence?"
I think they are, but I don't see what you imply by that.
"You expect me to agree that a man will rape a woman even though he is not sexually aroused by violence or rape?"
I don't expect your highly dogmatic control-freak personality to agree with anything. Again, I'm not even going to answer this question. Stop making up straw men. Learn the fucking difference between correlation and (reverse) causation.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 5 months ago
@ColibriAnna08
"So you believe the rapists have no desire to rape a woman? "
You call me a troll? I already explained this. I quote myself. "People who rape will probably fantasize about it. That does not mean that fantasizing about rape actually causes rape." Can't you see how you can't just turn that statement around and still expect it to be the unfounded truth? Learn the difference between correlation and causation and reverse causation. Go get a class in science, please.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 5 months ago
@ColibriAnna08
No, being a psychologist and having made a lousy study doesn't make you better. You are wrong yet again. Scientific methodology demands we question researchers and there studies and try to find errors, which in your studies were blatantly obvious to any scientist. You would have it that I can just claim full knowledge on Biomedical Sciences, just because I have a degree and wrote an article, regardless of how lousy it may be?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 5 months ago
@ColibriAnna08
I read your full study and explained carefully why it was wrong. Sorry, but unlike you, I adhere to the scientific method. I don't just read an abstract and say "I'll go with it". If you think that's weaseling out, you'd make a very poor scientist. Yet again, you already demonstrated you were clueless on methodology when you asked me to prove a negative. So it's no wonder that statistics and correlation vs. causation etc. are also strange to you.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 5 months ago