@Stier19812002 Yeah. Courier was certainly a great player, and would've won at least another 2-3 Grand Slams if it weren't for a certain guy named Pete.
For me both were great and fair players. They had my sympathy. In this match I was for Edberg, because I thought Courier would dominate the men singles tour for a decade. Silly, if you see, how things went on, but in a short period from 1991-1993 Courier were unstoppable.
courier is too good,and serious,it is good too,because when we are serious we can move forward and win!!! yet edberg,beker,bjorn,sampras...are good too!!!
@Stier19812002 Yeah. Courier was certainly a great player, and would've won at least another 2-3 Grand Slams if it weren't for a certain guy named Pete.
Oanatinus 11 months ago
@vladinikolov01
For me both were great and fair players. They had my sympathy. In this match I was for Edberg, because I thought Courier would dominate the men singles tour for a decade. Silly, if you see, how things went on, but in a short period from 1991-1993 Courier were unstoppable.
Stier19812002 1 year ago
Edberg's strongest weapon was his weakest in that match and Courier used his chances. I like Edberg a lot
vladinikolov01 1 year ago
edberg was better on faster hard courts like the US open where he beat courier in 92
robertk2007 2 years ago
courier is too good,and serious,it is good too,because when we are serious we can move forward and win!!! yet edberg,beker,bjorn,sampras...are good too!!!
poweroflove45 2 years ago
Edberg is still the better player, I love the serve and volley.
Courier is to serius
SchlagerOskar 3 years ago 2