Obama:"Help Me Finish The Fight" On Health Care Reform
Top Comments
All Comments (626)
-
Gag.
-
@Petekiv *Cough*...spam*cough* No but seriously ...homosexual? We dont want him either
-
look at the mindless zombies who are getting health insurance premium hikes and they are cheering about it! time to cut out the cancer in 2012!
-
Why isn't this dirty, homosexual, illegal, muslim coon, not in jail right now. Even starting with just hi SS # Fraud and morso, he is a Uganda citizen. Throw this porch monkey and his fat, ugly, size 14 shoed wife, michelle in prison also. Rick Wiles explains. Also: Her Name is Miss Ann. I respect James Manning, Paine, Corsi and Atlah, but the rest of the coons can't run a shoeshine stand. When will Hillary send Huma to an early grave?
-
and most people are going to keep the doctors they already have
-
i know what you meant but, thats a pretty bold statement. too say that just because obama wants to make sure people aren't denied coverage that he's is turning america into a dictatorship. its not like he is taking away are right to vote, hes battling corrupt insurance companies.
-
@Easybakeevann >>if i had to help 100 people and only 1 person really needed that help, than it was worth it to me<<
How about we make you help 500 people? Now that we know what a slut for socialist politicians you are, we just need to settle on a price.
-
@Easybakeevann >>if i had to help 100 people...<<
Think about what you said; your use of the word "had". Who would be making you help who? By what authority? Who the hell has a right to order you around and force you to give your money to somebody else? If "had" to help 100 people, it would be so that those 100 people would reelect whoever it was in power forcing me to give my money to them. That authority would lose my one vote and gain 100 votes--at my expense. That's corrupt!
-
@happystance10able that made no sense.... i dont know what your trying to say
-
@Easybakeevann >>if i had to help 100 people and only 1 person really needed that help, than it was worth it to me<<
Maybe you can afford that. Others can't. Why should they be denied the same discretion you want to exercise? Because you know better? Are you a wannabe dictator? Yours is a tribal mentality. What if you could help more people in other ways if you weren't forced to "help" in the way dictated to you by a corrupt higher authority? You assume only government can help people?
A lot of people live stupid lifestyles that take a big toll on their health. I have no control over how those people behave. Why should my hard-earned dollars be stolen from me and my offspring to subsidize the stupid, irresponsible behavior of strangers and puff-up the egos of some pretentious Leftists? Where's the morality in that? I know best what kind of charity I can afford. How dare you promote a system where that discretion is denied me. That is my right!!
grexample 1 year ago 21
For O-bots, it's not about people getting their MRIs before it's too late. It's about how O-bots feel about other people. Tell them that dogs can get their MRIs next-day while people have 6-8week waiting lists in socialist Canada, and O-bots are ok with it, because at least nobody's getting rich off people in Canada. They feel good about that. O-bots must approve of the motivations of other people. Once O-bots are in charge, results don't matter anymore. Bad results then are swept under the rug.
grexample 1 year ago 17