The assumption Of Unitarianism Part II
Loading...
Loading...
1,093
Loading...
Uploaded by October31st1517 on Oct 8, 2009
This is mainly a response to youtube user "bandaidmafia". In his video without knowing, he ASSUMES unitarianism.
Here is his video in it's entirty.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVR-NdxUP5E
10:16
The Assumption Of Unitarianismby October31st15172,888 views- 6:56
Muslim Threatens Christians for Speaking about Muhammadby Acts17Apologetics26,381 views
- 8:29
Yuratchka has some questions for trinitarians.by October31st1517925 views
- 3:02
Imfelicity4u Claims trinitarians can't countby October31st15171,008 views
- 1:15
Anti trinitarian attacks exposedby October31st1517859 views
- 0:30
stephen hawking rare interview slipby avigull865,778 views
- 2:14
McCalip Lies About Debateby October31st15171,259 views
- 4:32
The fruits of King James Onlyismby October31st15175,570 views
- 4:20
A conversation With A Jehovah's Witnessby October31st1517171,472 views
- 2:00
A Message To Black Hebrew Israelitesby October31st15172,298 views
- 4:39
Slaves of Christby TruthCrossing1,537 views
- 7:01
Faith Aloneby ProclaimHisWord4,985 views
- 10:00
Voices of a Liberal Faith - Unitarian Universalistsby UUAElectronicComm141,730 views
- 8:10
UNCOMFORTABLE: GOD HATES PEOPLEby vekl2,121 views
- 1:51
Unitarianism - Are Unitarians Christians?by ukunitarians2,003 views
- 5:04
John 1:1-18 Part 1by RobertMoreyJude3283 views
- 2:39
Dr J Vernon McGee Q&A - What is Unitarianism?by peaceradio790 views
- 9:33
Discussion about God, Sin, and the Nature of Manby 1tmoch352 views
- 2:11
Did Christ die only for His Sheep? John 10:11by Blogrich55816 views
- 5:05
John 1:1-18 Part 4by RobertMoreyJude3194 views
yes, the INFINITE complexity in unity. The same word is used of the man and woman and the two becoming "one flesh"
shieldsff 6 months ago
@dunklaw
For an UNDERSTANDING of WHO GOD is
left click on 2222 pauline
2222pauline 7 months ago
@AbrahamicMovement
Every Hebrew Lexicon/concordance I have referenced has defined Echad as united oneness and Yachid as the numerical one. "Yachid" is NEVER used of God in the Old testament.
BauerPower247 1 year ago
@AbrahamicMovement even trinis have stopped using the so-called "US texts" in Genesis." Sure, ok. Can you please show me in the bible where God is defined as 1 person. In otherwords that monotheism is unitarianism?
October31st1517 1 year ago
@BauerPower247...Yes God is not a human, nor son of a human [Num 23.19] but personal pronouns are there for a reason. Also, in case you did not know, even trinis have stopped using the so-called "US texts" in Genesis. See any Bible commentary/dictionary. Echad is the equivalent of the numerical value "1". Again, check your Hebrew lexicon/concordance. Just like in the Greek "eis" is the numerical "1".
AbrahamicMovement 1 year ago
@AbrahamicMovement
Personal pronouns such as "I, Me and Him" designate a single HUMAN PERSON. But remember God is much more intricately distinct and not subject to human limitations. Also consider Genesis 1:26 - Let US make man in OUR own image. Perhaps you could explain Deuteronomy 6:4 - "Hear, O Israel! Yahweh is our God, Yahweh is one (Echad not Yachid)!" Yachid means solitary oneness such as one in number. Echad is most often used as a unified oneness as is the case in Gen 2:24.
BauerPower247 1 year ago
The preconception I bring to the Bible is that a singular personal pronoun defines a single Person. This is a fair preconception. I go to the Bible believing that in Hebrew and Greek and Engish "I, Me, Him" designate a single person. God in the Bible is defined throughout by singular personal pronouns. This means that God is a single Person. This is a proper preconception, based on our laws of language. I speak after a career teaching in a Bible college. I think my assumption is valid..
AbrahamicMovement 1 year ago