Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

South Tower Collapse Defying The Laws of Gravity?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
11,339
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 20, 2006

Defying the Laws of Gravity?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • i can't believe that there is still people out there that actually believe that 911 wasn't an inside job.

  • @esjael

    I guess I'm not a conspiracy theorist then. It seems I just have a brain...

see all

All Comments (125)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Holymakinaw

    Let's see. Accounts of explosions and demo flashes from many witnesses actually there VS. some random guy on YT? Which evidence shall I choose? This is tough one, huh? And how about the video evidence of demo flashes? Yes, I agree. Laughable...

    Before the collapse:

    watch?v=LQYFABSlCQ4

    During the collapse:

    watch?v=elYw7MHf7GQ

    BE SMARTER.

  • @muzicmaker2001

    Some people(NOT EXPERTS IN DEMOLITION IN ANY WAY, by the way...) heard snapping metal beams and floors of a falling building slamming into each other and described what it looked and sounded like.

    LAUGHABLE that that's your "evidence".

  • @Holymakinaw

    And the same "MILLION TONS OF FALLING BUILDING" could not collapse WTC6? Really? Is that what you're going with? Ya know..reading and learning is still free. Try it. you might ike it...

  • @Holymakinaw

    "or demolition flashes..Only deluded, dumb Idiots think that."

    Just curious. By deluded, dumb idiots, did you mean a fireman?

    "before No. 2 came down, I saw low-level flashes. I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down ... You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw."- NYFD Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory

  • @Holymakinaw

    "There were no explosions"

    "We originally had thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down"- NYFD Firefighter Edward Cachia

    "It almost sounded like bombs going off, like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight"- NYFD Firefighter Thomas Turilli

  • @Holymakinaw

    "There were no explosions"

    "It was like a professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."- NYC Paramedic Daniel Rivera

    "There was just an explosion in the south tower. It seemed like on television when they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions."- NYFD Firefighter Richard Banaciski

  • @muzicmaker2001

    There were no explosions, or demolition flashes. Only deluded, dumb Idiots think that. A million tons of falling building caused all kinds of stuff to happen, but the two building were NOT loaded with explosives before the big planes flew into them, and they did NOT burn for 49 minutes before they suddenly "blew up" and caused a controlled demolition. LOL. Listen to yourself, Man. That shit sounds so absolutely retarded.

    BE SMARTER.

  • @muzicmaker2001

    LOL. "Falling debris"???? IT WAS ABOUT A MILLION TONS OF FALLING BUILDING THAT DESTROYED THE GROUND BENEATH WTC7. Not every building in the area was damaged enough to collapse, but that one obviously was!!

    BE SMARTER.

  • @Holymakinaw

    Ok, the plane impacted and that section was weakened, right? But, the 80-90 lower floors held the weight of the building in place since the 70's, right? Since the building fell in seconds, this must've caused the thousands of joint and bolts holding each floor to separate in nano-seconds, right? Did this also cause the explosions all thorought the building, demolition flashes, and pre-collapse ground shaking. Ya know, some of common characteristics of a controlled demolition?

  • @Holymakinaw

    I will understand this logic. You point to the plane impact as if this was the main reason why the Towers collapsed. But, when it comes to WTC7's collapse, all it took was some falling debris only damaging the one lower side of the building? Apparently, falling debris is equivalent to a plane impact in its ability to take down massive buildings in seconds..well except for WTC6, which was in between WTC7 and the Towers. Please use your head..its easy to do.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more