Richard Gage gives His Review on the Collapses of the twin towers and building 7..........
Please comment rate and share this video....
Thankyou
TS74
ps: plenty of Sun Symbolism going on?
Richard Gage gives His Review on the Collapses of the twin towers and building 7.......... Please comment rate and share this video.... Thankyou TS74
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
If there's any question in your mind as to whether 9/11 was controlled demolition you should watch "Blueprint for Truth".
Richard Gage gives essentially the same presentation wherever he goes with very predictable results.
Virtually everyone who sees the presentation comes away with the understanding that WTC 1, 2, & 7 were controlled demolition beyond a reasonable doubt.
In the real world, any collapse of building 7 would have been a partial collapse in the direction of the damaged area.
The worst case scenario for 1 and 2 would have been a partial collapse at the point of impact leaving the rest of the building standing.
There is no way on God's green earth that they could have collapsed at near free-fall speed through the path of greatest resistance without the use of controlled demolition.
1)Unless a more powerful lateral energy source, a building will almost always fall straight down. And they fell 60% and 125% longer than free fall acceleration.
2)Explained by the building destroying itself
3)Didn't happen. Dust cloud is ejected gypsum from the drywall.
4)Things explode in a fire; it doesn't mean explosives. No first responders are on record today believing bombs were set off.
5)45,000 terajoules of energy was unleashed. That much energy will eject things laterally.
By suing, I've forfeited the "$1.8 million average award" for a death claim I could have collected under the fund. Nor do I have any illusions about winning money in my suit. What I do know is I owe it to my husband, whose death I believe could have been avoided, to see that all of those responsible are held accountable. If we don't get answers to what went wrong, there will be a next time. And instead of 3,000 dead, it will be 10,000. What will Congress do then?
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Richard Gage gives essentially the same presentation wherever he goes with very predictable results.
Virtually everyone who sees the presentation comes away with the understanding that WTC 1, 2, & 7 were controlled demolition beyond a reasonable doubt.
Check it out on YouTube.
The worst case scenario for 1 and 2 would have been a partial collapse at the point of impact leaving the rest of the building standing.
There is no way on God's green earth that they could have collapsed at near free-fall speed through the path of greatest resistance without the use of controlled demolition.
That would be *strictly impossible*.
2)Explained by the building destroying itself
3)Didn't happen. Dust cloud is ejected gypsum from the drywall.
4)Things explode in a fire; it doesn't mean explosives. No first responders are on record today believing bombs were set off.
5)45,000 terajoules of energy was unleashed. That much energy will eject things laterally.
7)Would like to know how this rapid onset is in comparison to someyhing else.
8)Again, things explode in a fire; doesn't mean explosives. A 16 acre collapse zone from a 2 acre building is NOT "into its own footprint".
9)Repeating yourself
10)microsphers expected given the conditions. A 20 story building cushing someone can have a devastating effect on their body.
11)Evidence of a possible attack; not on 9/11 at the WTCs at 8:45 am.
- Beverly Eckert
Sounds of explosions - Imploded into its own footprint
Expanding pyroclastic dust clouds - Positive ID of Nano-Thermite
Several tons of molten iron - Rapid oxidation and intergranular melting
Microspheres of molten iron - 1400 victims blown into tiny fragments
Evidence of foreknowledge - Expert corroboration
Sum of Evidence = Controlled Demolition
These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with