Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Richard Gage on 911 Collapses!!! FOX 26 Fresno, CA

Richard Gage gives His Review on the Collapses of the twin towers and building 7.......... Please comment rate and share this video.... Thankyou TS74 ps: plenty of Sun Symbolism going on?  
 
Customize

More From: Truthspeaker74

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
563 ratings
Sign in to rate
35,925 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (4)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (604)   Options

Loading...
gotama420 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
if i ever need a skyscraper demolished i want these guys to do it they are real pros.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
KevinMerck (1 month ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
In the real world, any collapse of building 7 would have been a partial collapse in the direction of the damaged area.

The worst case scenario for 1 and 2 would have been a partial collapse at the point of impact leaving the rest of the building standing.

There is no way on God's green earth that they could have collapsed at near free-fall speed through the path of greatest resistance without the use of controlled demolition.

That would be *strictly impossible*.
cantonear1968 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
1)Unless a more powerful lateral energy source, a building will almost always fall straight down. And they fell 60% and 125% longer than free fall acceleration.

2)Explained by the building destroying itself

3)Didn't happen. Dust cloud is ejected gypsum from the drywall.

4)Things explode in a fire; it doesn't mean explosives. No first responders are on record today believing bombs were set off.

5)45,000 terajoules of energy was unleashed. That much energy will eject things laterally.
cantonear1968 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
6)Let me know when you have that positive ID

7)Would like to know how this rapid onset is in comparison to someyhing else.

8)Again, things explode in a fire; doesn't mean explosives. A 16 acre collapse zone from a 2 acre building is NOT "into its own footprint".

9)Repeating yourself

10)microsphers expected given the conditions. A 20 story building cushing someone can have a devastating effect on their body.

11)Evidence of a possible attack; not on 9/11 at the WTCs at 8:45 am.
cantonear1968 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
You're "facts" have been dealt with and dismissed. Several times over.
MattBaumann777 (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@cantonear1968 Can you link me to a video of another tall building falling this way due to fire?
KevinMerck (1 month ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
By suing, I've forfeited the "$1.8 million average award" for a death claim I could have collected under the fund. Nor do I have any illusions about winning money in my suit. What I do know is I owe it to my husband, whose death I believe could have been avoided, to see that all of those responsible are held accountable. If we don't get answers to what went wrong, there will be a next time. And instead of 3,000 dead, it will be 10,000. What will Congress do then?

- Beverly Eckert
KevinMerck (1 month ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Rapid onset of collapse - Symmetrical collapse

Sounds of explosions - Imploded into its own footprint

Expanding pyroclastic dust clouds - Positive ID of Nano-Thermite

Several tons of molten iron - Rapid oxidation and intergranular melting

Microspheres of molten iron - 1400 victims blown into tiny fragments

Evidence of foreknowledge - Expert corroboration

Sum of Evidence = Controlled Demolition

These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with
gotama420 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
@KevinMerck i think you mean pyro-plastic flow. the facts are really plain to see. any 4 of the interior columns would hold the building(out of 24)

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.