Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Skeptic Smackdown debate from Dragon*Con 2007 - Part 6

Recorded at Dragon*Con 2007. Skeptics Dr. Michael Shermer and Alison Smith debate believers Patrick Burns and Graham Watkins. In the final minutes of this debate Graham Watkins calls James Randi a...  
 
Customize

More From: dcolanduno

Loading...
Play All Stop Autoplaying | Play Next

QuickList(0)

1
Clear | Save

Related Videos

Featured Videos

9 ratings
Sign in to rate
1,677 views
Flag
close
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...
Sign in to post a Video Response

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (11)   Options

Loading...
JoeSixString (9 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
I have to comment on Patrick Burns and his being a so called t"true", skeptic. What he seems to forget is that Alison Smith and Michael Shermer too question things and are not dismissive. The big difference is that they just don't see the current evidence as being reliable. Whereas I suspect Mr. Burns sees even poor data as being proof of unusual phenomena.
airmen103 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -6
Marked as spam
Godsmasher22 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+6
Marked as spam
Shermer! Rocked! The! House!
aLifeLessMagical (2 years ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
Thanks for posting.
evanjm (2 years ago) Show Hide
+13
Marked as spam
I still can't believe he said that James Randi is a fraud.
LeeTheAgent (2 years ago) Show Hide
+7
Marked as spam
Yeah... that was pretty extreme in such a public forum... maybe his zombie mice told him to say it.
Godsmasher22 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+4
Marked as spam
There is a moment when the guy is talking about evps he said the great majority of our tapes have nothing to offer. The believers seem to miss the significance of this little fact.
MDHmodder (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
I wouldn't call james randi a fraud, but do you not sometimes assert skepticism itself with some skepticism?
mdarmour (2 years ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
sounds like shermer was the only one with a brain
Godsmasher22 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"At the end of the day, all research is still inconclusive."
That is not the kind of thing you want to hear or say about your research program!
But is singularly the funniest line in the whole debate.
This mouse study was published in the journal of parapsychology I am guessing?

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.