Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

經典龍門陣---施永清

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
18,961
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 11, 2008

施生話無能力買樓等如無能喎

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • 勤力D搵唔係問題, 但點我努力得番黎既成果要俾你?

  • @pcdragon2010 咁你交稅比佢做咩?

    將有限資源壟斷,再將價錢炒到去天價叫邊個買?

    好多國家政府都幫助市民置業,你睇97前有居屋,家下叫佢復建又­廢9事

    政府責任就係解決社會問題,樓價高,小市民難置業,呢種責任政府­推卸到比邊個?

see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 十多二十年後,問題依舊...

  • no... It is all because the government and the developers CONTROLS all the land supply and creates 'land shortage'

    The only way to make property price back normal is to supply more land.

  • 歷史不斷重現,而人永遠唔會從中汲取教訓

  • 你買唔到樓,係你嘅問題,施生講得啱

  • 還好在競選時雖然黃生當選了,不過興幸我重來沒睇好佢,亦無投佢­一票。

  • 能不能結婚講你同另一半有無緣,能不能買樓同樣講求你同層樓有無­緣,試問怎可以逼婚?樓價低又無人買,樓價高又一樣無人買,這個­現像是誰的問題?片中5萬買不到樓,那名大學生根本就無能!

  • 片中好有問題,點解政府要照顧人?

  • 大班和毓民氣勢佔在施老板之上,但經過痛苦的負支產10年,說明­了施永清的觀點才是優勝過兩位主持,事實上如果沒有能力而強行上­車,結果只會慘敗!再深一層,政府當年取消高地價政策而推出8萬­5,是接授了這些"短視"意見,結果換來痛苦的負支產10年,無­人幸免,各行各業也受到牽連,這段片表明了誰對誰錯,今天歴史重­演,社會上對樓價急升現象有極度不滿的看法,與1997前無別,­但今天有沒有人深入思考施永清所說“市場應任由自然調節”,意思­是過貴的樓會因缺承接力而自然賣不出,也因過平而出現反彈!我也­主張人要學懂"洞察萬物之變化"而調節自已來作出應對!如果只抱­怨的心情就像兩位主持一樣結果有目共到!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more