Climate Denial Crock of the Week - The Temp leads Carbon Crock

Find out what a straw man argument is, and how the most spectacular cherry pick in the history of scientific argument is just part of a day's work for the professional deniers.

read the primary studies mentioned here:
"The Ice core record: Climate sensitivity and future greenhouse warming"
http://www.atmos.washington.edu/2006Q2/211/articles_required/Lorius90_ice-cor...
"Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and
Antarctic Temperature Changes
Across Termination III"
http://icebubbles.ucsd.edu/Publications/CaillonTermIII.pdf

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Global warming
• global climate
• sea level
• climate change
• climate
• climate denier
• climate denialist
• Al Gore
• Peter Sinclair
• CO2
• carbon dioxide
• atmosphere ice
• ice sheet
• greenland
• antarctica
• ice shelf
• wilkins
• Larsen B
• breakup
• ocean
• ocean acidification
• green
• environment
• earth
• global warming
• Strawman Oz
• sea level rise
• glacier
• glaciation
• ice age terminations
• caillon
• hansen
• milankovitch
• milankovitch factors
• precession
• obliquity
• eccentricity
• crock
• crock of the week

[vmgqie]

global warming alarmist scientists are the deceivers. There the one spreading bullshit, go find climategate and read the emails and Michael Manns hockey temperature stick graph, now who's lying and being fraudulent you bunch of alarmist nazi assholes that's who

[greenman3610]

@vmgqie

thanks for bringing that up. I have a very popular vid on that.

watch?v=tz8Ve6KE-Us

[vmgqie]

@greenman3610 you haven't got any popular vid's , you belong to the lunatic fringe and you don't even know it. Just goes to show, you have your head stuck up your own ass

[m1aws]

@Aanthanur Ahh! The old "scientists wrote peer reviewed papers therefore its true" Canard.

Hansen is a major ideologue on AGW. All his papers on planetary atmospheres are already consigned to the bin when real data came through. All his past theories on GW are wildly off too. Yet reading his wiki page gives me the impression the man is a nut case!

does that make me wrong as well?

[Aanthanur]

@m1aws aaah the old "scientists have been wrong in the past, so they are wrong in everything i dislike" canard.

boring nonsense

[m1aws]

@Aanthanur Your empirical data being?

I've sat in awe reading about highly respected "scientists" made assertions that have been proven utterly wrong. The Panda is extinct, That Duck billed platypus in this jar is a fraud. The Wright brothers, The speed one can safely be in a train entering a tunnel. The lists go on and on.

AGW is political, the "scientists" are ideologues, there is no balance of fact and not one jot of empirical proof that this planet is warming due to CO2.

[Aanthanur]

@m1aws LOL you are nuts

[m1aws]

@Aanthanur What for? There are 1.3 million peer reviewed papers since 2006. The easy pickings are the one that are on top of the funding tree.

Think of the Milankovitch cycle for once. Worst case scenario for cooling. Now give it 6 months where The North is facing the Sun and is the closest.

This is how well (paid) climate scientists do not understand very simple things. They are the deniers.

[Aanthanur]

@Joe2000King so we should take the word of a Journalist about a scientific theory above that of scientists that have actually studied the stuff and published their findings in peer reviewed journals?

can you say confirmation bias?