60m sprint... (8.13)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,055
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 15, 2008

8.13s from first movement...

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (hornblowerr)

  • Good form, I am sure you can run faster than 8.13...

  • pb is currently 7.72s. also have a wind aided 7.55s...

  • hey greg was woundering if you had posted any more vidos up lol hows the hammy going???

    if you want to get good top end speed try this at training.

    mark out 90m and each 30m build up your speed

    so like 1st 30m 75% 2nd 30m 80% 3rd 30m 85% and the last 30m 100%

    or do in's and out's

    mark out 100m

    start of rollin

    first 30m realyd hard driving 40m come up and hold your form and last 30m 100%

    give them a try

  • thanks for the suggestion, damian. that's actually one of my favourite exercises and always seems to preceed good races.

    I was looking out for you at stawell but I didn't see you there. did you change your mind about going??

Top Comments

  • Yeah..no offence, but when I was 6 years old.. I ran the 60 in 6.41 sec.....*bursts out laughing*

    OK so the truth is..I was 19, the wind was to my back and it was downhill... :)

    Oh and good job BTW. Not the fastest, but at the very least, you're out there trying to get faster.

    Cheers

see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nice one,

    my grade 9 PB for the 60 was at a meet at York University,

    Ran 7.51 .. 2nd place was 7.52.. insanely close.

  • at least you got the guts to put your time up

  • because there is a delay at the start due to the reaction time of the timer. also, timers tend to anticipate the finish a bit...

  • how is it 0.2 0.5 slower? electronic time make sureit is exact so it would be two tenths of a second faster!!

  • it is hard to make a judgement unless you are talking about electronic timing. if your results are handtimed then you usually need to assume that the "actual" time is around 0.2-5s slower. you probably need to improve everything. as the distances get longer handtimed results become proportionally more accurate and will give you a better indication of where you are at...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more