911 WTC Shakes 12 Seconds Prior To Collapse!!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,444
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 5, 2010

This matches the newly releasd NIST video evidence if a deep underground explosion approximately 10 seconds prior to WTC7 collapse..,,here,,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrnmbUDeHus&feature=player_embedded

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @way2easy2love You can even hear explosives sounds in this video (with better quality) There is a rattle sound prior the explosives!( or whatever it was)Use headphones, it's blocked, but still there! Most people didn't analyze the sound of this video! I did, because i know, what it sound like! I heard weird sounds on 9/11 in New York and I found it almost totaly blocked,only in this video!Watch for better copy if this video and you will hear it!

  • @way2easy2love Cameraplanet video has unbelievably good audio. The audio picks up the surrounding street sounds, sirens voices etc and we see the towers burning in close up about a block away. In fact the sound of a helicopter flying further away than the towers can be heard with no trouble. I would go so far as to say the mood is almost.."quiet" Then the building simply lets go.. Out of nowhere and without one crack or bang.

    Explosives?

    Not shaped charges no way.

  • @way2easy2love Ridiculous. And i speak from first hand experience. Yes there are many types of explosives. But the one thing they all share in common is that they are... EXPLOSIVES!!. There are loads of excellent audio quality videos out there. Saying they have all been "altered" is ridiculous. I am sorry guy its not possible to have a news camera crew shooting the collapse from 800 feet away and have them record nothing.

    Not remotely possible. I've done it.

  • @roquefortfiles im not one to argue buit diffrent types of explosives are louder and quiter also i dont think you will ever find a decent audio quality video of 9/11 that hasnt ben tampered with

  • @dreamdiction The central steel core was demolished was it?? (LOL)

    Well my friend this is what linear shaped charges sound like going off.

    watch?v=obJe66QHx_Y&feature=re­lated

    There were a zillion cameras shooting the WTC that day. Show me just ONE that has this kind of audio in it. They would have to.

    Show me and i will shut the hell up.

    50 angles of the towers burning. Not one with audio remotely close to this.

    How come? cause it never happened that's why.

    Prove me wrong.

  • @dreamdiction Its camera shake, nothing more. Its a zoomed lens. Nearly impossible to keep stable. Probably the guys foot from walking around. Who gives a shit anyway. there is not one explosive charge in any of those buildings. I know from experience. I shot a CD of a 25 story office building. Trust me!! if there were charges in those buildings EVERYONE would know about it without fail.

    Its all a bunch of nonsense.

  • @roquefortfiles There are many other people who used tripods and their cameras were also shaken by ground vibration before the collapse started. Notice also in this video how at the moment the collapse begins, the TV tower moves downward, quarter of a second before everything else starts moving downward. This happened because the central steel core was demolished allowing the whole building to fall without any core resistance. see more watch?v=dueVm1UGvXo

    Also, google the "LAVON AFFAIR"

  • No dude!! What shakes is your crappy cheapo mount tri pod zoomed camera. Any photographer knows its almost impossible to steady a zoom lens on a tri pod.

  • I think that the floors imploded in on themselves due to the fire. Obvious steel loses its tough properties when heated to just under half of its melting point. Also given the central core of the WTC's was taken out partially by the planes. This leads me to think the floors fell in first, internally, which shook the building. The outer core remained fractionally later as its external steel framework, which the building is famous for, held up longer as it was essentially seperate from the inside.

  • I don't think this proves anything one way or another but thanks for putting it on line for review.

    The diagonal line, -maybe a cable or wire or even a crack in the window- at bottom left seems to shake in unison with the vibration seen on the building, indicating that the shaking is from the camera rather than the tower. It's possible it could be both, i.e. that the building the camera was in was shaken by a movement or possible explosions in the tower.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more