"Psychic" gets busted!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,915,972
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 17, 2006

For real psychic readings visit http://www.AskRealPsychics.com
Discover where to find proven, authentic psychics you can trust
---------------------------------------------------------------
This psychic who is obviously a fraud is featured on the Montel show.


Please check out my other videos!

Hate Mail #1
from soulblazinsista
Message:"I REALLY DO NOT RESPECT THE WAY YOU TALKED ABOUT SYLVIA BROWN! I'VE MET HER ON SEVERAL OCCASSIONS AND I'VE READ ALLLL OF HER BOOKS! FOR ME ALL OF HER PREDICTIONS HAVE BEEN TRUE SOO IDK WAT UR ISSUE IS! MAYBE YOU NEED AN ANGEL OR TWO OR THREE??? IDK BUT SHE'S COOL TO ME! I UNDERSTAND YOU HAVE UR OWN OPINION BUT YOU SHOULD THINK OF OTHERS TOO! DONT BE SO SELFISH K? COOL"

My Reply: "I got a prediction for you: A certain someone... who... very recently... you sent a Youtube message to... doesn't care."

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (11,326)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @pinkfoundations Exactly, plus if you unfamiliar with the person you are trying to reach, you may reach the wrong person.

  • Cold reading + recorded media = Bad move.

  • @tehUBERn00blet I think you're right about one thing for certain, normal scientific experimentation alone is not enough to validate something like this. Although, I am certain that in a short moment spent with Sylvia in person and not on Montel, she would easily convince any skeptic.

  • Sometimes it's hard to connect........

    You aren't expected to know absolutely every detail.

  • @tehUBERn00blet You are correct that your personal experience is not sufficient for me to believe these claims.

    It isn't necessary to find the source of psychic powers if there isn't a phenomenon to examine. The first step is merely to find someone, anyone, who can reliably make predictions with more accuracy than chance would suggest under properly controlled conditions. No one has done this as far as I know, but I'm open to evidence. Which experiments exactly are you citing?

  • @stephen52100 Any one of them could win a million dollars from James Randi. None of them have.

  • uh oh...... dumb bitch.

  • busted

    

  • @tehUBERn00blet Yes, fickle indeed. At times makes me jumpy/startled. Other times in awe. It can't be measured by science, yet.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more