Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Video Sample Tests
Uploader Comments (3puncte)
Top Comments
-
I'm watching in 360p and thought I was watching a 720p video. Very good quality.
All Comments (33)
-
wow this looks amazing, what picture style did you shoot with?
-
@3puncte FUCKIN' INCREDIBLE CLARITY THEN. PROBABLY HAS A LOT TO DO WITH YOUR 5D MKII ALSO.
-
BRAVO!! This video was awesome. I have this lens and i love it.
-
I bought this lens for the Nikon mount as I had switched camps from Canon, it's a fantastic lens for the price that I paid for it. however, I tested this same lens on a Canon mount and it was nowhere near as good as the Nikon copy unfortunately. I highly recommend this lens but if you have the chance to test it before you buy it then I would suggest that you do so.
-
@3puncte - looks amazing, well done.
-
the quality of the video is superb! what picture style did you use?
-
in Malaysia.sigma will cost me around RM3800 and tamron would be around 2800, nikkor a lil' bit expensive...around rm6000
-
@3puncte no post?! wow i'm definitely saving for this! thanks for the sample test!
Question: How does the Sound of the OS compare to the very noticeable sound of canon's IS ?
In my country there is only a difference of $600 dollars between canon and sigma 70-200 2.8 both with IS/OS, would you stick with sigma or canon is worth the extra $600?
My priority of course is quality, but also stabilization and silence
Enlazador9 8 months ago
@Enlazador9 in my opinion sigma is more silent; canon is II is weather proof and has more contrast - if theese aspects are important for you than it's worth the extra money; for anything else i like the sigma.
3puncte 8 months ago
Did you enhance the footage at all? During post/filters? If so, what did you use (program wise/filter wise)?
f1nndlay13 8 months ago
@f1nndlay13 no post
3puncte 8 months ago 3
HEY, is it worth buying this rather than the non OS version ??
ninjaboyteen 10 months ago
@ninjaboyteen yes
3puncte 10 months ago