Blooper: burn rate comparison rig burned down

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
138 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 19, 2009

This was supposed to be a burn rate comparison of P-6 (sorbitol, kno3, aluminium dust) and P-7 (sorbitol, kno3, aluminium dust, iron oxide dust). I used a naked thick noodle of P-6 as an igniter and that was probably the mistake, as the hot gases ignited the sides of both fuel sticks and the whole cardboard rig literally ceased to exist not even a puny second after the flames popped out. The camera was about three feet away and zoomed in and even there it felt disturbingly hot.

I'm using P-6 noodles as igniters in my rockets when electric igniters are either unavailable (due to battery being dead usually) or not suitable (motor without wiring holes and/or thin nozzle). They work better than a green visco which doesn't always ignite the mix. The mistake here was using a naked noodle instead of one coated in paper and aluminium foil.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more