Change Player Size

Richard Dawkins Enemies of Reasons - Cold Reading.

A segment from Richard Dawkins Enemies of Reasons Part 1.  
 
Contains
Content From:

More From: terminalcommand

Loading...

QuickList(0)

76 ratings
Sign in to rate
8,046 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (51)   Options

Loading...
eddie2042 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
'i feel.. ifeel.. i feel.. i feel..'

i feel like kicking you in the fucking face you asshole piece of shit fuck you
Damion5488 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
newcoyote,

Now that is something that you and I will never be able to be in agreement on. You can't prove your side and I can't prove mine. It comes down to belief or to personal experience. There is no earthly way that you can prove me wrong or vica verca.
curea229 (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
If you're religious it can be proved that you have no proof. Unlike science.
Damion5488 (4 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Unrotunately a lott of the dead who haven't passed over and get any sort of spiritual connection with the living try and cling on to them or heave them with them. This casual talk about a stomach ailment which they may have had in the physical world before they died is plain silly. They don't have a stomach any more ... how could anyone 'sense' that of some one who is dead?
newcoyote (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
@Damion5488 The whole notion that anything is there after a person is dead is silly. If not, at the very least asserting there is something, with authority on specific conditions like the status of the "soul", is nothing short of absurd.
TheBhoyJoe (1 month ago) Show Hide
+5
Marked as spam
Why do the spirits only ever give their first initial? For a psychic fraudster, it must be a fucking nightmare having Dawkins sit at your table.
needparalegal (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -5
Marked as spam
Lol, as someone who has worked as a professional psychic I cringe when any sad ass psychic asks about a relative with an "E" name. Too bad Michael Crichton is dead, he might actually be able to break Dawkins skepticism. His logical approach to investigating psychic phenomena is hard to argue with. Read his book "Travels" it may make a believer out of those of you with open minds.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.