Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Iran's nuclear program-Iran Today-06-17-2011-(Part1)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,337
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (72)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • One cannot stop Iran until the international community put sanctions to Iran, China and Russia's economic and military pipelines.

  • The Persians would be utter fools if they would not at least try to build nuclear weapons as soon as possible! Just think of what has happened to harmless Libya a few years after it has abandoned building nuclear weapons; so if the Persians want to avoid an armed liberation of their oil by the Encashment Washington for the sake of the Seven Oil Sisters they need the bomb; for even if they could repulse an American attack, they are in the same danger as Japan without the atomic bomb.

  • Russia have been disappointed in Iran ..

  • The lady giving the report is being extremely sarcastic. Yes other countries have nukes, Yes the US and the Russians have the most, yes some countries with nuckes aren't slapped with sanctions. But if Iran were to develop one, they would be the 1st country in 60 or so years to use it on another country (isreal most likely). Iran doesnt need nuclear energy, there sitting on large deposits of black gold.

  • This all might be true. But why would Iran not allow check ups by the iaea on their nuclear facilities in the first place? Playing hide and seek games in the past with the iaea makes you look suspicious. And why on gods green earth is a country with massive amounts of oil and gas reserves using Nuclear energy at all? Nuclear power is not durable and the minerals used for this power are even more likely to run out before oil.. we have an old saying and that is: where there is smoke there is fire!

  • If you were sitting next to Israel wouldn't you want a couple nukes?

  • those who definitely DO need nuclear weapons against their enemy who wants to annihilate them, are the palestinians.

  • @mstmsh1

    Yes, I agree that self-defense is necessary and ethical.

    I wish that self-defense weren't necessary. But it is, unfortunately. Maybe someday soon our world will be more peaceful so self-defense will be a rare occurrence, soldiers will no longer die in battles, and we will be able to spend more resources on helping our neighbors.

  • @eastariel

    yes -do not kill is good for everyone

    not to someone acpecially

    any way this comand transelation is-do not murder

    means it is not include cases of people that want to destroy u or yr family & u r forced to protert yr family by stoping the killers at the most affective way

    but wish all this wasn't needed

  • @mstmsh1

    Returning Moses to Judaism? Good idea, especially the commandment, "Thou shall not kill."

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more