9/11 Pentagon " Call Me Crazy " No Plane wreckage is burnt

They didn't even take the time to scorch the Wreckage found at the Pentagon! Look Closely at the staged debris.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Plane
• Crash
• Pentagon
• wreckage
• no
• burns
• set
• up
• planted
• evidence
• No
• wings
• ton
• engines

[JohnMGilbert]

Just because they found no plane at the Pentagon doesn't mean we shouldn't believe the government.. You have to use your imagination.  Just keep saying, "A plane hit the Pentagon, a plane hit the Pentagon,..." Maybe it was an invisible plane. They wouldn't lie to us. Would they?

[idolhands50]

@BoardFlipper5150 Your right only 4 layers. Actually I knew that, thanks for downplaying the fact that it was ONLY 4 layers. 4 layers of concrete and lots of steel. Why the hell are we even spending all that money on bunker busters and all these other high tech explosives when we could just use good ole fashion jet airliners as weapons. Shit, they penetrate everything.

[marksman500]

@maxfischer36..."I thought the Pentagon would have been alittle sturdier than a Jumbo jet. I was wrong !".

---

Only half wrong. The aircraft (essentially 13 foot Dia. tube) disintegrated upon impact & in the process the landing gear & trailing portions of the fuselage (luggage, freight, seats) opened up a hole allowing the plane to pass into the building.

The wings filled with jet fuel exploded upon impact (marks on wall) raining confetti all over the lawn & nearby cars sitting in traffic.

[maxfischer36]

I saw with my own eyes the hole in the pentagon. Put it this way if you stood the pentagon on its side that plane would have sheered the most fortified concrete structure in the world IN HALF ! Is it possible for a Jumbo jet to cut through the worlds strongest structure ? If so we should think about designing new building materials because I thought the Pentagon would have been alittle sturdier than a Jumbo jet. I was wrong !

[lopez39k]

i'm not saying i have proof or that a Boeing 747 is the actual plane that hit both towers or the Pentagon or crash into the field in PA, but what i do know is that all large airliners are powered by a turbofan-type powerplant while smaller are either a turbojet (with/out an afterburner section) or a tuboprop (propeller powered)... i've been in the Corps for 9 years and the 5 1/2 years, studied and certified for a year on the governments dime, the ins' and outs' of a multi-million dollar plane

[lopez39k]

who ever made this vid is an idiot... i worked on F/A-18s' for 5 1/2 years and of course the debris in 1:17 is not going to match any part of the engine in 1:22... you fail to understand that a Boeing 747 engine is a TurboFAN meaning it has anywhere from 3-5 stages of giant fans that power the smaller compressor stages inside, what 1:17 is showing is a small portion of the compressor stage... invest your time building a model plane for $19.99+tax at Walmart and actually learn what took me a year

[PinkLederhosen]

I evened it up. Now it is 85 likes to 85 dislikes. There is one video on YouTube with almost 7,000 likes and dislikes on each side. It had 4,125 when I found it on Thanksgiving.

[marksman500]

@JohnMGilbert..." Just because they found no plane at the Pentagon doesn't mean we shouldn't believe the government"...." Maybe it was an invisible plane"...

--------

Ya, you can’t have a good conspiracy without the Govt. forgetting to plant plane parts!

The invisible plane didn't work either as it was seen by hundreds of witnesses.

[marksman500]

@idolhands50J..."ust strange that a facility of this type could not produce a clear film. Don't you think security of this building to be very high"....

-----

Yes, the Pentagon is a very high security area and they rely on the "Armed On-Site Military" to protect it, not cameras.

They use sec. camares at points of entry such as the guard shacks and entrances, not pointing at a blank wall where the plane hit.

[idolhands50]

@marksman500 Your missing my point, I am not saying the Government planned anything.Just strange that a facility of this type could not produce a clear film. Don't you think security of this building to be very high, especially when the WTC towers were hit?Is our Government that moronic? If so, that is even scarier than a conspiracy theories.Lol My problem is what happened to the WTC buildings as far as there collapse.

[marksman500]

@idolhands50..."It is ridiculous to think that they could not produce a more conclusive video at the time this event took place."...

----

That's my point!... if the Govt. had this pre planned, you would have expected them to shove one of their nice and clear pre made fake video of an A/A jetliner in our face the next day .