well, then..you're sitting at work being unproductive. Wasting company time. Like I said, you're a waste of space. And no..I don't have a problem w/security guards. Just dirtbags who commit crimes, take lives and skate away scot-free.
"Then why haven't the convictions been overturned?"
Well, for one thing, the cover up is STILL being investigated. You're also talking about 21 years worth of paperwork, and evidence to dig through. Much of it has already been done by private investigators &..yes..the media. No help, of course, from KC's finest. Some people who were important eye witnesses are dead (due to old age or other natural causes) & other reasons.
Hmm..let's see. Initially you replied 3 HOURS ago..Then CAME BACK a 1/2 hour ago & replied again. Who doesn't have a life?!..I think it's you, pal. What?..Have u been sitting on Youtube for the last 3 hrs? I have a problem w/ ushers or janitors. You should try to be MORE than that, in life though. My point is/was, that you're a poser. You try & act like you're educated & "know all the facts," when u have no clue WHAT you're saying. You're 33 & can't even carry on a coherent conversation.
Do you not realize how ridiculous you sound. Once again, you accuse me of parroting you...while you copy MY statements and try to use them against me. I write "what are you twelve or something" and then you use it. Get a clue, moron.
(continued #2)specific INSTANCE yourself, that would back your claim that the accused committed the crime. Oh, & FYI, if I was an original juror on this case, I probably would've found the accused (those who were convicted) guilty too! The jurors went off the "evidence" that was presented to them. They didn't know about the coercian, they didn't know about the testimony of others (that was convienently "forgotten" by the D.A.). They did what they thought was right at the time.
(continued#1)against KCPD? The security guards? What would be their motive for it? They can't all be "sensationalizing" stories. It was all the inconsistencies in the case that kicked up the whole story around the original "investigation" in the 1st place. I mentioned SPECIFICS in this case...facts that SHOWING major inconsistencies in the police investigation. You mentioned *drumroll* NOTHING. You kept going back to the "12 jurors found them guilty" blah blah garbage. You didn't mention ONE
You are such a phony. Why would I need to "Copy/Paste" your information? All you do is parrot the things that I say, anyway (You know.. I said whatever happened to "innocent until proven guilty" & you came back w/ your "original," "thought-provoking" 'whatever happened to 'found guilty in a court of law' statement). You accuse me of being a conspiracy nut, yet YOU accuse 3 different sources of media of engaging in "yellow journalism." And for what?.. Do you think they were somehow "conspiring"
Oh geez..another "great" comeback. What are you...twelve? You, seriously, aren't even worth talking to. Keep it up though. I'm sure someone with your intellect will go far in life. I'm sure you can always sweep popcorn off movie theatre floors and, hey, they need someone to clean park restrooms!
R.i.p. Have those REAL criminals (not the ones actually convicted) ever been tried? R.i.p. all those fire-fighters
BarnacleBillsBastard 2 years ago
*I don't have a problem w/ushers or janitors.
soundsfromnothing 3 years ago
well, then..you're sitting at work being unproductive. Wasting company time. Like I said, you're a waste of space. And no..I don't have a problem w/security guards. Just dirtbags who commit crimes, take lives and skate away scot-free.
soundsfromnothing 3 years ago 2
"Then why haven't the convictions been overturned?"
Well, for one thing, the cover up is STILL being investigated. You're also talking about 21 years worth of paperwork, and evidence to dig through. Much of it has already been done by private investigators &..yes..the media. No help, of course, from KC's finest. Some people who were important eye witnesses are dead (due to old age or other natural causes) & other reasons.
soundsfromnothing 3 years ago
Hmm..let's see. Initially you replied 3 HOURS ago..Then CAME BACK a 1/2 hour ago & replied again. Who doesn't have a life?!..I think it's you, pal. What?..Have u been sitting on Youtube for the last 3 hrs? I have a problem w/ ushers or janitors. You should try to be MORE than that, in life though. My point is/was, that you're a poser. You try & act like you're educated & "know all the facts," when u have no clue WHAT you're saying. You're 33 & can't even carry on a coherent conversation.
soundsfromnothing 3 years ago
Do you not realize how ridiculous you sound. Once again, you accuse me of parroting you...while you copy MY statements and try to use them against me. I write "what are you twelve or something" and then you use it. Get a clue, moron.
soundsfromnothing 3 years ago
(continued #2)specific INSTANCE yourself, that would back your claim that the accused committed the crime. Oh, & FYI, if I was an original juror on this case, I probably would've found the accused (those who were convicted) guilty too! The jurors went off the "evidence" that was presented to them. They didn't know about the coercian, they didn't know about the testimony of others (that was convienently "forgotten" by the D.A.). They did what they thought was right at the time.
soundsfromnothing 3 years ago
(continued#1)against KCPD? The security guards? What would be their motive for it? They can't all be "sensationalizing" stories. It was all the inconsistencies in the case that kicked up the whole story around the original "investigation" in the 1st place. I mentioned SPECIFICS in this case...facts that SHOWING major inconsistencies in the police investigation. You mentioned *drumroll* NOTHING. You kept going back to the "12 jurors found them guilty" blah blah garbage. You didn't mention ONE
soundsfromnothing 3 years ago
You are such a phony. Why would I need to "Copy/Paste" your information? All you do is parrot the things that I say, anyway (You know.. I said whatever happened to "innocent until proven guilty" & you came back w/ your "original," "thought-provoking" 'whatever happened to 'found guilty in a court of law' statement). You accuse me of being a conspiracy nut, yet YOU accuse 3 different sources of media of engaging in "yellow journalism." And for what?.. Do you think they were somehow "conspiring"
soundsfromnothing 3 years ago
Oh geez..another "great" comeback. What are you...twelve? You, seriously, aren't even worth talking to. Keep it up though. I'm sure someone with your intellect will go far in life. I'm sure you can always sweep popcorn off movie theatre floors and, hey, they need someone to clean park restrooms!
soundsfromnothing 3 years ago