Evolution's funding like that of Hitler's rein

Reference documentation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9aNuolofQM&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRnO3_fMoYI



A letter to today's Atheists in regard to your love of Modern Science's faith in "Chance" alone.

What is this "chance" of "nothing" you claim created all of this world in which we feel, hear and see? A claim that life exists only from and by a word called "chance" without any prior intent before life itself existed? What does this mean in logic more than magic? Here is truth in what it means to be a part of your humanity of chance as a whole theory. The basic notion in this modern assumption by science is that without any prior intent, life first was birthed by some unknown cause of non-life via random chance alone and without any prior intent. What about moralities and other meaningful things of life without conception with intent in mankind?

This speculation in science claims without proof that intent in life only came about after life existed and so called "evolved" by these following means alone; In this theory, intent in life is no more than ones individual or group's common survival instincts within "evolved" subjective rationality in which mankind merely derives subjective moral concepts over long periods of time as abstracts alone. Concepts that only originated from mechanisms of existing evolving subjective emotions found in modern mankind like in sympathy and empathy.

In short, today's blinded scientists claim as fact that there is no such thing as a true objective moral law, not even one!

Modern science claims in this world-view theory that there is no such thing as any given set or single moral truth. A claim that no law by God or Man can be objective because this science claims that there was no prior intent that existed prior to life existing itself for any bases of such claims to be founded upon. Science today has completely rejected with blindness any notion of a Creator with intelligence and intent. Teachers and follower of this science now must claim that even to throw babies into a fire to reduce overpopulation and stay warm can be only "subjectively" wrong because any "objective" moral objection to this evil deed would require a mechanism of prior intent in mankind's life before our life even existed.

What does this assumption say about their theory of the "evolution" of humanity from this random chance of life's origin? Modern Science's blind assertions in the faith and power of "chance" states these as facts:

There is no God, no soul, no afterlife, no real love, no hate, no good, no evil and no crime. Morality is no more than an illusion of opinion and self-awareness and consciousness as an individual with freewill is no more than biological chemical delusions. Also; that there are no predetermined human obligations to follow any moralities as a value system via this science of theory nor can the random gifting in natural selection and equality coincide without prior objective intent as such in life. To accept natural selection having no prior intent in life, prior to life existing, rejects equality as even possibly being objective if equality only appears after life already exists in this fashion.

These are the fruits of lost souls in our modern age of science, themselves lacking all philosophy and attempting to guess at an origin of life and of humanity while trying to subjectively reject any notion of Creation or an Intelligent Designer. They also in-turn blindly deny humanity as well, as just a myth created by chemistry in the mind. Science can discover what we are but science fails to understand that it can never inform us of who we are. A world-view with no moral truths, "so anything goes", isn't going to make God's world a better place, it will make Our world a living Hell! The fallacy of this faith masked as modern science in our age gives magical powers to no more than the mere word of "chance". If this magic of no prior intent, thus, no moral truths desires to replace a construct of moral truths founded in humanity via mankind's soul itself; this will not only lead to great negative benefits to humanity, it asserts direct denial of humanities existence itself.

Atheists, how can you have such a love for your world-view and your asserting science of assumptions in such magic of the single word of "chance"? The very godless science you worship rejects your own logic and love as nothing more than mere biochemical illusions! Are we made in God's image or evolution's freak of nature? This is the question one should ask...

Romans 1:20-22
~ For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools,..~

Category:

Education

Tags:

• evolution
• Hitler
• morality
• God
• spontaneous generation
• philosophy
• humanities
• Intelligent Design
• Wg

[1billion1deaths1]

@Pelonetillo haha come back with facts, not theorized assumptions u live on, coward.

[Pelonetillo]

Comment Pending Approval? lol, theists with the worst arguments tend to censor the most.

[abaneyone]

Love your Romans 1:20-22 quote in the information about the video!

[FirstFreedomFighter]

@WILLTHEWGMAN

More specifically, with regards to the E. coli that can digest citrate -- this adaptation requires only a few specific mutations. However, highly specified biochemical systems -- like the flagellum -- require many specific mutations. This is what makes it unlikely for the flagellum to evolve, and what makes it reasonable for the ability to digest citrate to evolve.

[WILLTHEWGMAN]

@Atharka

You seem not to understand the mutations are recessive or dominant. In the E.Coli, just because some E.Coli can now consume citrate and others still can't does not mean the ones that now can are no longer E.Coli! We as humans can build up tolerance, produce new digestive enzymes and well as new immunity by complement binding to antibodies. All these things have Nothing to do with becoming another specie in doing such things! These things are merely adaptation!!!

[WILLTHEWGMAN]

@evensgrey

Alien residents, not having any land inheritance, might be merchants or hired laborers. There was a possibility of their becoming wealthy. (Le 25:47; De 28:43) Generally, however, the Law classified them as among the poor and outlined arrangements for protecting and providing for them!

[WILLTHEWGMAN]

@Atharkas

All observed changes in the Pod Mrcaru lizards are in fact epigenetic, that appeared during onto genesis because if distinct environmental factors. The DNA does not differ between lizards any of them! Also, the lizards revered back to their 1971 version in just 8 weeks after being forced back to the 1971 diet again! No one claims that marcoevolution is very fast OR reversible, but these are facts in this case! How can you call this macro-evo when the DNA is the same & all reversible.

[evensgrey]

@WILLTHEWGMAN So you deny the existence of Leviticus 25:44-46? You know, the bit specifying that foreigners held as slaves were chattel property?

[Atharkas]

@WILLTHEWGMAN

It seems you didn't read about the Pof MrCaru italian wall lizards and their new cecal valve not found in the original population (and in the general reptile kingdom).

[KilliansIrishRex]

yep, uh-huh, supppper.