Tactics in refuting moral relativism
Loading...
Loading...
12,444
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 10:58Moral Relativism is Evilby VenomFagnX12,690 views
- 6:24Debate: Moral Relativism v. Moral Absolutism - ...by tiuchannel2,071 views
- 3:36Give Me An Answer: Moral Relativism & The Holoc...by dilesios7,117 views
- 3:33What IS Moral Relativism?by imagesfromapoet5,512 views
- 4:38Rob Bell vs. John Piperby cullenhartley59,760 views
- 3:08Why morality does not exist (1) - The good Sama...by groesteridiot3,390 views
- 12:04Relativism (1 of 7)by philosophyreligion2,920 views
- 3:30Moral Relativismby rationalresponder12,475 views
- 9:12Atheists, If Hitler Was Right, Then Jesus Was W...by KristinaLovesJesus109,822 views
- 4:37Road Runner Tacticby TheAnswerVideo959 views
- 4:14Absolute Truth vs. Relative Truthby Dorkmaster19,626 views
- 4:46What is cultural relativism ?by nofearinlove4181,489 views
- 4:096 Reasons Not to be a Moral Relativistby 3superdogs1,530 views
- 8:55Relativism Debunked 1by Armando7654281 views
- 4:37Response to Greg Kouklby moorezw4,081 views
- 7:21Cultural Relativismby Busada6,770 views
- 1:40#2 Is Truth Relative?by abrarunning1,442 views
- 9:26Greg Koukl " Relativism question Apologeticsby grandconjunct7,415 views
- 11:14Moral Relativism vs. Raising Happy, Well-behave...by fpontario2,485 views
Insultingly stupid.
sqlblindman 3 weeks ago
Too stupi
sqlblindman 3 weeks ago
This is so stupid I can't even begin to explain.
seblasian 1 month ago
this video is proof that christians are complete morons. lol.
shockoflogic 2 months ago 2
eeeh like it or not, it's all relative. Especially when you use circular reasoning to justify your point.
coyoteself 2 months ago
@Orygyn "I CALL STRAWMAN"
Yes, Strawman here... How can I help you? ;)
sinistar99 2 months ago
@sinistar99 I don't think that's the issue. Either way, there is a moral influence being applied, which does refute the claim to "be a moral relativist", but does not refute the concept of moral relativism itself. But I agree with your last point. There's a difference between saying "You can't tell me what to do" and "Don't tell me what to do": the difference between morally absolute inference and morally informed action, (respectively), the latter remaining in compliance with moral relativism.
ZomBLord 2 months ago
The point of moral relativism isn't correctness. It's simply individual acceptance of uncertainty.
Anyone who tries to argue moral correctness is a hypocrite. Anyone who tries to argue against moral correctness with anything other than "you're wrong" is also a hypocrite, as he/she has just conceded the possibility that his/her morals may be incorrect.
It's self-refuting to argue moral relativism, but it's also self-refuting to try and refute it without making assumptions/illogical inferences.
ZomBLord 2 months ago
3).
NO, tolerance isnt a moral absolute it's simply a logical necessity of engaging in rational discourse. Most people like to be logical and engaging in debate is a great way to get points across.
No public universal actions guides were prescribed.
types10000 5 months ago
2). Same as tactic 1, by living in a society you are subject to the social contract of that society ie. the law. the fact the law originated via the collective agreement of particular subjective values doesnt change the fact that it is currently an objective standard that can be appealed.
The Christians actions violate the concept of right/wrong set by this standard.
types10000 5 months ago