Bruce Lipton - Biology of Perception 1 of 7

Sondelachez: Then why don't you say something more concrete and intelligent... let's hear your perspective...

The social content of our lives essentially evolves around a politically manipulated market mechanism where immense humanity have nothing except their ability to sell their energy for a wage so they can recreat themselves for a lifetime of exploitation so the rich can get richer, for this exploiation to be seen as freedom we have been taken in by the ideology of ruling class, that slavery is freedom,that capitalism is liberation from tyranny.

I find it hard to believe that this guy believes what he is saying. Complete and utter bullshit.

What is it about You Tube, that makes some people want to verbally abuse, people.
Is there not enough "Nice" on the planet ?
What should be a valuable aid to sharing our thoughts and views, gets rubbished, so quickly.
What is missing on our planet, have we forgotten that should see the good in our fellow man, or have I ?

I totaly agree with Bruce Lipton regarding the primacy of the perception of the enviornment as the cornerstone of our well being or ill health and more. The true knowledge is that we live in a profit driven class society of wage slavery of immense majority through the mechanism of politically manipulate market. We need to reclaim ourselves and our planet for a truly harmonious existence from within and without.

Looks like I've got an admirer here. How far down will my comments get thumbed? Any bets?

Only if you deem them worthy of discussion. If not, perhaps some one will come along and happen upon them and broach a nice chat. eh?

I do deem them worthy of discussion and I do deem worthy the effort to try and open the mind of those who believe that science covers EVERYTHING.

"You are saying robotic determinism is less than real human value. Am I right? "
It doesn't really matter what is my personal belief. My claim is that you can't help but make value judgments- you are always in the "game". Even Nihilism, which negates the very notion of values, is a values system- much like no decision IS a decision.

Your'e claiming that Dawkins is NOT making an evaluation but states a fact- like that the earth is round, right?
But in reality, you treat people (at least some) as if their lives have an importance, a meaning of some sort, a real value. If you would face a choice between saving a robot or a human-being, would it be hard for you to make that choice?
Isn't it a bit inconsistent and illogical to believe that all human-beings are robots or genes vessels and then go around in your---->

I think that just like abiogenesis was a game changer for the chemistry of planet earth. The life forms that emerged could not be predicted by the simple fact of replication and evolution. I think the emergence of intelligence is a similar game changer. A form of intelligence that emerged was ours. We are no longer just the animated replicators our predecessors were, because there is another replicator working the field of ideas. It is not constrained to ideas of bounded physics.