first in a two part series with rob Williams of psych-k. (if anyone has the part with R. williams please post it!)
'the bottom line is, genes do NOT control our biology, that an assumption made ye...
first in a two part series with rob Williams of psych-k. (if anyone has the part with R. williams please post it!) 'the bottom line is, genes do NOT control our biology, that an assumption made years ago that was never even proven scientifically - it just seemed so correct that we bought the story ... if the mechanism actually worked according to the textbooks, ie. if the genes control biology, then at least 120,000 genes would be required to make a human. but when the human genome projects results were in, ... it was discovered that 2/3rds of the genes (needed to support their model) were missing. Its not that the genes were missing, it was the understanding that was wrong. "We have to come to a new way of understanding biology. This 'new' understanding has actually already been in the leading edge of science for 10 years now. It takes at least 10 or 15 years for science to take a fact from its first inception and get it out into the public so that the people can understand it. That means anything in current textbooks is at least 10 or 15 years old. what your going to hear tonight is whats going to be the future textbooks. " -Bruce Lipton in the Biology of Perception [ www.brucelipton.com ]
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
The social content of our lives essentially evolves around a politically manipulated market mechanism where immense humanity have nothing except their ability to sell their energy for a wage so they can recreat themselves for a lifetime of exploitation so the rich can get richer, for this exploiation to be seen as freedom we have been taken in by the ideology of ruling class, that slavery is freedom,that capitalism is liberation from tyranny.
What is it about You Tube, that makes some people want to verbally abuse, people. Is there not enough "Nice" on the planet ? What should be a valuable aid to sharing our thoughts and views, gets rubbished, so quickly. What is missing on our planet, have we forgotten that should see the good in our fellow man, or have I ?
I totaly agree with Bruce Lipton regarding the primacy of the perception of the enviornment as the cornerstone of our well being or ill health and more. The true knowledge is that we live in a profit driven class society of wage slavery of immense majority through the mechanism of politically manipulate market. We need to reclaim ourselves and our planet for a truly harmonious existence from within and without.
I do deem them worthy of discussion and I do deem worthy the effort to try and open the mind of those who believe that science covers EVERYTHING.
"You are saying robotic determinism is less than real human value. Am I right? " It doesn't really matter what is my personal belief. My claim is that you can't help but make value judgments- you are always in the "game". Even Nihilism, which negates the very notion of values, is a values system- much like no decision IS a decision.
Your'e claiming that Dawkins is NOT making an evaluation but states a fact- like that the earth is round, right? But in reality, you treat people (at least some) as if their lives have an importance, a meaning of some sort, a real value. If you would face a choice between saving a robot or a human-being, would it be hard for you to make that choice? Isn't it a bit inconsistent and illogical to believe that all human-beings are robots or genes vessels and then go around in your---->
I think that just like abiogenesis was a game changer for the chemistry of planet earth. The life forms that emerged could not be predicted by the simple fact of replication and evolution. I think the emergence of intelligence is a similar game changer. A form of intelligence that emerged was ours. We are no longer just the animated replicators our predecessors were, because there is another replicator working the field of ideas. It is not constrained to ideas of bounded physics.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Is there not enough "Nice" on the planet ?
What should be a valuable aid to sharing our thoughts and views, gets rubbished, so quickly.
What is missing on our planet, have we forgotten that should see the good in our fellow man, or have I ?
"You are saying robotic determinism is less than real human value. Am I right? "
It doesn't really matter what is my personal belief. My claim is that you can't help but make value judgments- you are always in the "game". Even Nihilism, which negates the very notion of values, is a values system- much like no decision IS a decision.
But in reality, you treat people (at least some) as if their lives have an importance, a meaning of some sort, a real value. If you would face a choice between saving a robot or a human-being, would it be hard for you to make that choice?
Isn't it a bit inconsistent and illogical to believe that all human-beings are robots or genes vessels and then go around in your---->