Evidence for a Young Earth - Convicted - Dr. Brad Harrub

http://www.focuspress.org Join Dr. Brad Harrub in examining the evidence for a young earth. Is the earth millions and billions of years old? Is the earth under ten thousand years old? Is evolution true? Is carbon dating accurate?

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• age
• of
• the
• earth
• evolution
• geologic
• column
• carbon
• dating
• radiometric
• millions
• years
• thousands
• billions
• fossils
• atheism
• flood
• Darwin
• Richard
• Dawkins
• Intelligent
• Design
• Creationism
• Charles Darwin
• Dr.
• Brad
• Harrub
• Focus
• Press
• population
• statistics
• christopher
• hitchens
• moon
• star
• light

[rpk58]

@PiltdownSuperman What is amusing is your attempts to sidestep the issue by calling me names. The phenonemenon that we are discussing was explained mpore than 100 years ago by scientists. Read and educate yourself.

By the way, your attempts to gain upperhand in the dialog by calling me "Buttercup" is amusing and shows flawed judgement on your part. I am male and probably older than you. Dont jump to conclusions, kid. Learn

[PiltdownSuperman]

@rpk58 Wow, what an amazingly dismal comment. Trying to cover up your own foolishness?

Sorry, Buttercup, your ad hominems, guilt by association, red herrings and other "thinking" won't wash. But do go on, your lack of brain power is quite amusing to the rest of the class.

[rpk58]

@PiltdownSuperman Yes, they were buried rapidly, in a vertical position. If you did the research, you would see how other sediments settled around them. Bad excuses? You fancy yourself to be better than scientists who studied these things professionally? May be you are a Kent Hovind fan. Dont embarass yourself, learn, please!

[PiltdownSuperman]

@rpk58 And still only bad excuses are offered. The truth is, they were buried rapidly, could not be buried over huge amounts of time. Do some research before embarrassing yourself further, Buttercup.

[rpk58]

@PiltdownSuperman The phenomenon of Fossilised trees acroos svereal strata has been explained in the19th century, that is more than 100 years ago, by scientists. It is called polystrate fossils. Do some research before embarassing yourself.

[rpk58]

@TheMrgoku1985 Well said

[rpk58]

@ThePopCulturePastor No, the scientists also examine the "guesses", review them test them, try to tear holes in them. Only when there is a consensus among the majority of the scientific community is something acepted as a valid theory.

About the tree thing - google "polystrate fossils" browse through the results, look at sites other than the creationist sites. You may learn something

[rpk58]

This video is so dishonest and false. The speaker is either outright lying, or he got all his information from Kent Hovind.

The phenomena of trees across several strata is well known, and has been explained scientifically for atleast the past 100 years. Google "Polystrate fossils", read through the results and research.

[drugnort]

cant watch this the tree thing! this has been explained in great detail but you just go on with your closed eyes..but the good news is i made it till 7.12 on his video

[VaiRoth]

@ThePopCulturePastor It also gave you the internet via its self correcting system,as well as germ theory,make sure you never use medical science ever