http://www.LiveAction.org has more info about this story.
Our student investigative team at Live Action finds Planned Parenthood of Bloomington, Indiana covering up the sexual abuse of a 13-year-o...
Our student investigative team at Live Action finds Planned Parenthood of Bloomington, Indiana covering up the sexual abuse of a 13-year-old girl.
This video is first in a series of hidden camera footage, collected over the summer, documenting the sexual abuse cover-up of the abortion industry across the nation.
Despite a consistent pattern of lawlessness and abuse, Planned Parenthood, a tax-exempt "nonprofit", made over $100 million in profits last year and has a billion-dollar budget. Planned Parenthood receives over $300 million from taxpayers.
Planned Parenthood, a tax-exempt nonprofit, made over $100 million in profits last year and has a billion-dollar budget, nearly a third of which comes from taxpayers through government funding.
For interview or special requests for copies of footage and documentation, please contact Lila Rose, President of Live Action, at lilarose@liveaction.org.
Music by David Elijah Rose. Editing by David R. Schmidt Undercover actors: Jackie Stollar and Lila Rose
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Once again, not a religion issue, but a scientific issue. Probably a hard thing for you to grasp considering your stellar spelling & grammar, but I will give it a shot, speaking s l o w l y a n d u s i n g s m a l l w o r d s.
A group that should teach health and give accurate information to help is giving false information (counselor one story, man that claims to be a dr another) (Hippocratic oath First Do no harm(this is the oath a Dr takes)) Use of fear to coerce (convince)
u can call me stupid, as an ignorant way for you to attempt to justify your arguments, all you want. Since its complete lies, it only furthers the futility of your pointless banter.
This is a group fo SOCIAL workers. its their job to HELP the people who come in, not to castigate them every time they come in with information that may be unlawful, if they did, the girls wouldnt come in at all.
Are you giving permission for me to call you stupid? How gracious of you. Thanks. I shall end the exchange as you want to debate the definition of life vs the actions of the workers that violated law. Your inability to stay on focus suggests that you up your Ritalin dosage.
again, you show your ignorance through changing the subject, and talking down to an obviously superior mind, but its ok, your little pro life buddies are ignorant enough to believe you, so at least you have someone to talk to that thinks you sound intelligent. as i said in my last post, their JOB is social worker, its their JOB to help these people, not castigate them, if they did, they wouldnt have a job. get over yourself...
I look at the science behind what is and isn't life for issues that affect others. There is also a judicial precedent. Tell me how a man can be convicted of murder of 2 in a murder of a pregnant woman if they know she is pregnant, but that same woman can abort a child and it be called a procedure?
because, when the mother chose to keep the child, the child became a life, when a woman chooses to not keep the child, it is not. Thats what the law states. I dont think its right either, but thats a republican law anyway. BUT to say you look at it scientifically is just moronic, if you did, you would understand that a fetus has no brain function until between the second and third trimester, so first term and early second term, its nothing more than a growth.
That is such a flawed argument. If it were choice to keep defines life, then abortion would be allowed into 3rd trimester. Re: Brain function obviously does not start for some, as in your case raztis, untill late in life. For the rest of the humans, I quote medical journals (science)
Brain waves have been recorded at 40 days on the Electroencephalogram (EEG). H. Hamlin, "Life or Death by EEG," JAMA, Oct. 12, 1964, p. 120
Brain function, as measured on the Electroencephalogram, "appears to be reliably present in the fetus at about eight weeks gestation," or six weeks after conception. J. Goldenring, "Development of the Fetal Brain," New England Jour. of Med., Aug. 26, 1982, p. 564
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
A group that should teach health and give accurate information to help is giving false information (counselor one story, man that claims to be a dr another) (Hippocratic oath First Do no harm(this is the oath a Dr takes)) Use of fear to coerce (convince)
This is a group fo SOCIAL workers. its their job to HELP the people who come in, not to castigate them every time they come in with information that may be unlawful, if they did, the girls wouldnt come in at all.
BUT
to say you look at it scientifically is just moronic, if you did, you would understand that a fetus has no brain function until between the second and third trimester, so first term and early second term, its nothing more than a growth.
Brain waves have been recorded at 40 days on the Electroencephalogram (EEG). H. Hamlin, "Life or Death by EEG," JAMA, Oct. 12, 1964, p. 120