Global Warming Meltdown Part 2 KUSI News, Weather and Sports San Diego, CA Coleman's Corner
Top Comments
All Comments (22)
-
The only consensus now is that man made global warming was a hoax.
-
MY FAMILY OWENS THATIT IS A MCKINNON PRODUCTION IM A MCKINNON IM GETTING AIRED 2 DAY AND ITS GONNA BE SHOWED THIS FRI AT THE PPR PREP PIG SKIN REPROT LOOK 4 MY CHEER TEAM THEETORREY PINES FALCONS
-
MY FAMILY OWENS THATIT IS A MCKINNON PRODUCTION IM A MCKINNON IM GETTING AIRED 2 DAY AND ITS GONNA BE SHOWED THIS FRI AT THE PPR PREP PIG SKIN REPROT LOOK 4 MY CHEER TEAM THEE TORREY PINES FALCONS
-
Have you read the IPCC? It never presents this as fact, only as highly probable. And there were many "white lies" told in those reports to "help build consensus", but never an outright fabrication.
Many scientists criticize their approach, but almost none their findings.
-
Gore had the Supreme Court of the US rule against him in 2000, so he didn't make us pay anything. Cleaning up the earth= bad ?ok!
If Gore is to be punished in your mind, then Bush and Cheney should be hanging at high noon for sending our children off to die in foreign invasions of sovereign Countries. Global Warming or Young Americans being used as cannon fodder....hmmm, let me think...
-
If you are refering to the Nature articles, yes you need a subscription. I tried to thumb through my back copies to find it but could not find them. The thing comes every week and several hundred pages long. It would be nice if they had an annual index.
I'll root around and see if I can come up with a public domain reference to them. I'll reply again if I am successful.
-
If you can post anything that pokes a hole on the AWG thoery go ahead. The scientific world waits with baited breath. But I suspect you cannot.
If you are refering to the IPCC Impacts report, they dont charge for access. Google "IPCC Far", go to the IPCC WGII report and it is in chapter 10 section 6 part 2, second paragraph, second sentance. It reads: "....the likelihood of them disappearing by the year 2035 and perhaps sooner is very high if the Earth keeps warming at the current rate..."
Funny how the IPCC couldn't find a climatologist and had to use a railway engineer, who had already lied in court, as its head.
sydneydoc 2 years ago 4
Good point.
I'm sure Pachauri will pretend not to notice.
sydneydoc 2 years ago 3