A0 yknot?

I am sure you have no valid arguements against evolution. If you do please present them... lol

Category:

Education

Tags:

• evoltuion
• is
• science
• creationism
• dung
• nadiateeze
• canes
• moron
• out
• of
• boredom

[msginca]

Ok then ...

Little hearts are popping out of my head and gently floating away ... typical reaction when I watch a nadiateeze video.

[tiptiptapable]

Can you please cover your shoulders and the stuff between them you are giving people swelling and all sorts of redness. It's not healthy.

[hairyreasoner]

Perhaps we could kiss. Or perhaps just talk. Talk, then kiss. Kiss then talk.

Or maybe just kiss.

[clotheapple]

+she is pretty adorable.

[cslighty]

Is any evolutionist interested in that specific detail? Although geology and paleontology are far from my career or official education I have been educating myself on these topics. I will see for myself this summer since I have to drive by that way as it is.

[GetMeThere1]

If you are concerned about false conclusions you should do what I suggested before: learn enough about the techniques of geology and paleontology and go there and examine for yourself.

I'm personally not interested in the details. My doctorate is in molecular and cell biology--not paleontology. The biological sciences comprise a COLOSSAL amount of information; it's almost impossible to really keep up with even one area of research.

[cslighty]

Or how about arriving at false conclusions, trying to piece something together without God there because you ignore Him altogether. You still havn't answered my question about the cat footprint though. I really am curious what your take on it is.

[GetMeThere1]

People with not much education seem to believe science is an "opinion" (like "there is no god") that is then defended with evidence. That is not correct.

Scientists observe phenomena and then attempt to theorize a mechanism behind the phenomena--and add experiments to test their theories.

Scientists DO NOT conduct their work based on "wanting god to not exist." There are significant numbers of scientists who believe in god AND evolution (although I'm not one of them).

[cslighty]

Of course it did'nt get major coverage. The majority of the scientific community wants God to not exist. As I said before, that's what It boils down to. I wrote my last response in a rush this morning. The cross section peice that I was reading about was of a large cat footprint that was found in that area. Not the human prints. I noticed you didn't respond to it and I was wondering what your thoughts were on that.

[GetMeThere1]

"true" story? Are you going to give evidence for THAT! If it were "true" I'm QUITE SURE it would have gotten major coverage. There HAVE been scientists who have perpetrated scientific fraud. Every time it was found it was aired out for everyone to see--scientists are people, too.

I know many top level scientists, because I worked for my doctorate at a top level university. The idea of destroying geologic/paleontological evidence is POISON to any scientist I've ever known.