9/11 CONSPIRACY: FLIGHT 175 WAS A MILITARY PLANE

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
28,820
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 26, 2008

When the footage of the second plane to hit the WTC is closely analyzed, there are several anomalies that are apparent. The first is an asymmetrical missile-like object on the belly of the plane that should not be on a commercial airliner. The second is the flash the emits from this "pod" a second before the impact with the building. Was this plane indeed a Commercial airliner? Was the anomaly on the underside of the plane actually a high-tech weapon?

Visit: http://www.AppleWhispers.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @SecretService80 your name is secretservice. nobody's gonna take ur word against 9/11 theories. MIssing plans and passangers?? shot down out at sea, or somewhere remote prehaps?? I belive it was two planes, full of people, hijacked, but I also belive those hijackers were funded and trained by secret service (C.I.A) personal. and giving 'V.I.P' treatment going through security at an airport. The evidence is there. just do some god dam research!! And we shall never shut up, or the truth will die

  • Nobody believe this. All of those stupid conspiracy people just et photos that have been altered to make it look like a conspiracy. And that guy who they were talking to who said "that was a military plane" how could you tell when they are going extremely fast at full speed and you only have about 1/2 second to see the plane. Retards...

see all

All Comments (77)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Millitary plane? Try telling that to the families of the dead passengers and crew

  • it could be a valkyrie rocket for the one that hit the pentagon

  • @Cathaydude for the twin towers crash

  • its a united airlines 767

  • what i really wonder.. where the hijacked planes were really sent. im sure they saw a risk in using commercial planes with people. that could rebel and make the planes crash on a different place than WTC. finding the real crash sites of the commercial missing planes could be the ultimate evidence to show it was all a BIG lie what the Gov told. something im sure is the 911 truth movement will not end ever. until all real terrorist a taken to justice and that one day the truth will be know.

  • yep.. kind of funny how you present photographic evidence.. that the plane WAS NOT A COMMERCIAL AIRLINE PLANE' but they still deny it.. what they see with their eyes...also the way building 7 collapsed.. was 100% identical to a demolished building with bombs.. but they still prefer to believe what the gov says.. instead of what they clearly see.

  • @WUDJABEABLE /watch?v=cHHghW4Pg5k I got around 3 more buddy, 1 from the news, and 1 civilian, 1 firefighter, go ahead find me ----1---- who said it was an UA plane.

  • @Xendrius what video evidence? The evidence i saw was a grey and navy boeing 767 hitting the south tower. match the bely of flight 175 with the belly of a united airlines 767. They are the same, mad people posting on utube its a missile underneath the plane haha or a missile hit WTC. load of BS. 11 witnesses seen a millitary plane? Send me the link

  • @WUDJABEABLE Was not a military plane? Nice theory bro, I'll believe the 11 witnesses who said it was a military plane and actual video evidence. You go ahead believe what CBS news tell you. And pass that joint will you.

  • @Xendrius nice, but this defintaley was not a millitary plane

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more