One, that's odd because Kucinich and Paul are SO antithetical in their philosophies. Two, anarcho-capitalism, which is what Paul seems to be at least drifting towards ('libertarian' is word that means anarcho-capitalist in the US), is in the words of Chomsky, "a doctrinal system which, if ever
implemented, would lead to forms of tyranny and oppression that have few
But I don't think we would have gone to war if it wasn't for the for-profit concept. I think whenever you have a covert agency like that, though, it can serve the interests of whoever is in charge of it. Let me ask you: Why not Kucinich?
you are such a little dillhole to support Ron Paul, you cant disagree with corporatism? no medicare, medicaid or social security?
GnomesAmok 9 months ago
what is this about speaking of "his message"?
i thought this was about us? WE the people and so forth?
aren't there things we can be doing right now as individuals and as a group?
why this rallying around guaranteed failures?
isforbliss 3 years ago
Don't vote for Obama
teo829 4 years ago
we don't want blind patriotism and blind freedom vote for Ron Paul
warlord2080 4 years ago
Corny and cheesey = good.
Hip = vapid nonsense.
Look at anything Ron Paul has written, said or done in the last 50 years and you know he is 100% sincere.
Warfare, welfare, double-digit taxation and a culture which is best summed in the statement "My baby-daddy wannna be a rappah"
OR
Ron Paul.
wsmith68 4 years ago
"Free contract" is exactly what you'll hear RP talking about. Also, the constitution is a flawed document.
jtr3030 4 years ago
"There isn't the slightest possibility that
its (in my view, horrendous) ideas would be implemented, because they would
quickly destroy any society that made this colossal error. The idea of "free
contract" between the potentate and his starving subject is a sick joke,
perhaps worth some moments in an academic seminar exploring the consequences
of (in my view, absurd) ideas, but nowhere else."
jtr3030 4 years ago
One, that's odd because Kucinich and Paul are SO antithetical in their philosophies. Two, anarcho-capitalism, which is what Paul seems to be at least drifting towards ('libertarian' is word that means anarcho-capitalist in the US), is in the words of Chomsky, "a doctrinal system which, if ever
implemented, would lead to forms of tyranny and oppression that have few
counterparts in human history.
jtr3030 4 years ago
Kucinich, Gravel are my two choices on the Dem side. But Ron Paul just seems to have the best shot of the three and I trust his constitutionalism.
redliterocket4 4 years ago
But I don't think we would have gone to war if it wasn't for the for-profit concept. I think whenever you have a covert agency like that, though, it can serve the interests of whoever is in charge of it. Let me ask you: Why not Kucinich?
jtr3030 4 years ago