Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Re: Re: Ron Paul is a waste of time

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,604
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 22, 2007

Video Cam Direct Upload

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (163)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you are such a little dillhole to support Ron Paul, you cant disagree with corporatism? no medicare, medicaid or social security?

  • what is this about speaking of "his message"?

    i thought this was about us? WE the people and so forth?

    aren't there things we can be doing right now as individuals and as a group?

    why this rallying around guaranteed failures?

  • Don't vote for Obama

  • we don't want blind patriotism and blind freedom vote for Ron Paul

  • Corny and cheesey = good.

    Hip = vapid nonsense.

    Look at anything Ron Paul has written, said or done in the last 50 years and you know he is 100% sincere.

    Warfare, welfare, double-digit taxation and a culture which is best summed in the statement "My baby-daddy wannna be a rappah"

    OR

    Ron Paul.

  • "Free contract" is exactly what you'll hear RP talking about. Also, the constitution is a flawed document.

  • "There isn't the slightest possibility that

    its (in my view, horrendous) ideas would be implemented, because they would

    quickly destroy any society that made this colossal error. The idea of "free

    contract" between the potentate and his starving subject is a sick joke,

    perhaps worth some moments in an academic seminar exploring the consequences

    of (in my view, absurd) ideas, but nowhere else."

  • One, that's odd because Kucinich and Paul are SO antithetical in their philosophies. Two, anarcho-capitalism, which is what Paul seems to be at least drifting towards ('libertarian' is word that means anarcho-capitalist in the US), is in the words of Chomsky, "a doctrinal system which, if ever

    implemented, would lead to forms of tyranny and oppression that have few

    counterparts in human history.

  • Kucinich, Gravel are my two choices on the Dem side. But Ron Paul just seems to have the best shot of the three and I trust his constitutionalism.

  • But I don't think we would have gone to war if it wasn't for the for-profit concept. I think whenever you have a covert agency like that, though, it can serve the interests of whoever is in charge of it. Let me ask you: Why not Kucinich?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more