'Killed Parents With Hammer' Before Throwing A House Party

Story ... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2016142/Tyler-Hadley-17-killed-parent... ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
17 year-old Tyler Hadley allegedly bludgeoned his parents to death with a claw hammer, hid the bodies in a bedroom and used Facebook to invite his friends over for a party.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• news
• associated
• press
• boy
• kills
• parents
• with
• hammer
• his
• wood
• throwing
• fox
• bbc
• abc
• nbc
• after
• media
• before
• school
• fox news
• breaking
• reporter
• day

[stonee206]

i don't believe in death sentence, no matter how horrible the crime was

"Why do we kill people for killing people to show that killing is wrong?"

[ChannelThePoetry]

@stonee206 not to show killing is wrong, more like to keep society more safe, and keep them from taking more lives!

[michaelswank7]

I know a girl personally she was 15 she looking at 50 she shot het dad 5 times in the back of his head so the press says; she has been raped beatin and mentally abused but her dad since she was 5 so for 10 years she went through hell it's not what the papers say go deeper in to the household family friends what would you do with no excape and your dad get up to pull the trigger on you? Would you die for nothing or live and fight for something???

[ChannelThePoetry]

@michaelswank7 well in that case you can understand her motivation for her doing that ... but this case is far different, no abuse exists ... he threw a party for god sakes after it ... so {abuse} did not motivate his decision to do such a horrible thing ...

[Alex19al]

this isn't a good place for nissan to advertise....

[milad9ronaldo]

burn the motherfucker to death!

[MF0TY]

@MF0TY I feel the judicial system should be reformed so that we have one catagory for people we aren't sure did the crime but feel are too dangerous if they did to be let out should be kept in a life sentance until proven innocent and the other group we can prove with video footage or some other substancial evidence will go to the chair table ect. what ever means of ececution you would deem civil and apropriate to off societies garbage. That is what I mean to say*.

[MF0TY]

@LovinLearnin No problem, I see the value in that games have other benefits but none of them are terribly tangable aside from the read benefits anger release and the possiblity of controling drones if you enter the military, but yeah. Everything in moderation has it's use I suppose.

[MF0TY]

@AsSomedayItMayHappen You and it would give m solace if someone raped a kid I had and murdered them to know they couldn't hurt anyone else, it wouldn't bring my kid back, it wouldn't make it right, it wouldn't fix those problems but at least I would know they couldn't rape and kill anyone elses kid and I would spare others the possiblity of sharing my pain.

[MF0TY]

@AsSomedayItMayHappen How many innocent people died in world war 2? Was it worth the risk, I feel the same odds apply here, but in light of that I feel there should be two groups of people put in something like a life setance and something along the lines of people that we know did it with substancial evidence such as witnesses or actual videos of the crime or what not and people we think did it who are kept with no chance of getting out unless evidence proves them innocent? Would that work for

[AsSomedayItMayHappen]

@MF0TY And if there has been a mistake, then what? Killing someone who could potentially be innocent isn't worth the risk. Every modern democracy except the United States (and Belarus, and they barely do it anymore) has decided that this is the most pragmatic for justice, and keeps society the safest.

Killing someone will never bring "closure" to the victims, and it won't bring back their loved ones. It certainly won't give them solace.

[MF0TY]

@AsSomedayItMayHappen how much I'd love my father, it's about how he's in the wrong and he's a danger to society and the parents deserve to have the solace that at least this man will never be able to hurt another child ever again, you don't get the solace with rehabiliatation which can fail or keeping them in prison where they have a chance to get out even if given a life sentance.

[MF0TY]

@AsSomedayItMayHappen Governments job is to protect the rights of it's citizens who are not taking rights from others I.E. their rights to live or not be raped. By killing pedophiles repeat offender murderers and rapists we prevent them from indangering the rights of others, is that a reasonable arguement? If my dad raped a little girl or boy, I'd want the state to fry him he's my biological father. I love my father, but I'd still watch him fry if he did something that horrible. It's not about

[AsSomedayItMayHappen]

@MF0TY You absolutely could change my opinion if you presented a reasonable argument that a state should have the right to declare someone doesn't have the right to live.

The reason I brought up that personal example was because it takes a personal situation in order for you to realize that killing solves nothing. It's easy to speculate and say "this is how we solve the problem", but when you lose someone you love like this it puts things into perspective.

[MF0TY]

@AsSomedayItMayHappen You save lives by removing those that are dangerous from society, I can't change your opinion but blood thirsty would be publicly allow animals to sodomize pedophiles, having public murders where everyone can walk by pick up a stone and throw it at the murderer over a corse of three days till they die is bloodthirsty. Taking out dangerous people from soceity in the quickest and most painless way we can because they would endanger society if they got out isn't bloodthirsty.