Hugh Ross and Kent Hovind radio debate in 1999
Top Comments
All Comments (47)
-
I think hovind is correct regarding this matter.hughs theories are scriptually unsound and he is adding to the Bible using mans logic
-
Kent made a good point, plants don't have the breathe of G~D in them. Hugh's theories are knew.
-
ahh who the fuck cares...just live your life...be a good person go to heaven
-
It's great to have Hugh Ross to bring some balance. Thanks for posting!
-
Hugh Ross is credible, check out his ministry "Reasons to Believe". They have a solid model. Hovind is a hack. He gives Christians a bad name. In his televised debate with Hugh Ross, he spoke condescendingly to Dr. Ross the whole debate, then whenever Dr. Ross brought up valid scientific evidence, Kent interrupted him and claimed that he doesn't understand and God would never make things so complicated that he couldn't understand them. Hovind is either dishonest or stupid or both.
-
Hovind?
The failed auto mechanic?
The uneducated, violent fraud artist
who has been charged with assault, convicted of fraud,
and is currently in prison?
I mean, okay, he has a white lab jacket,
and he's a great poster boy for Creationism,
but nobody in their right mind would go to Hovind
for scientific facts, reality, or any sort of truth!
-
you need to learn about the lies and crontradictions of your bible
the pictures of evidence we have for the Big Bang. ?
MarlinMr 3 years ago 4
This is good. I agree with Hugh Ross
rac19722009 1 year ago 3