obama's fake bc for dummies.wmv

I'm trying to make the point that the "image" Obama released of his supposed birth certificate is proof alone that it is a forgery. A real life copy of this image would be impossible to exist or create. I could have gone into much greater depth but wanted to keep this simple and to the point.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Obama
• birth certificate
• fake
• forgery
• Hawaii dept of health
• elections

[clarity023]

/lnAoY_i5UGY

[smokeyriverband]

@clarity023 glad to see that you're still around. Are you about ready to give up on your man Obama?

[smokeyriverband]

@Jonim40 quote: "they print them up from information in a database" the image of the bc was directly from the bound book. It was not printed from information in the database. Here's the basics of how this procedure works. an image of the bc is taken while in the bound book..it's scanned in either using the green rattan background paper or it was added later. Onaka adds his signature stamp and seal and it's supposed to be official. How do you get the 25 or so anomalies from that?

[Jonim40]

@smokeyriverband You don't seem to understand. Hawaii only does electronic birth certificates. They print them up from information in a database. The originals are kept in a vault. This was made, the "long form" that Hawaii does do anyway, not for 20 years, was taken out of the vault, and created using the current security paper. WTF, how dense are you? The security paper is what makes it "official" and the old document was scanned over it. It was done one time for the stupid birthers.

[smokeyriverband]

@Jonim40 you don't seem to understand that if the image of the bc was real you wouldn't have to flatten it. I mean why would you? It would have been in one layer from the start. You only create layers when you start editing it. This is obviously way over your head...you don't even comprehend the basics. You can't handle the truth...so move on...there's nothing for you to see here.

[Jonim40]

@smokeyriverband I know the truth, and you're still an idiot. So what, the person didn't flatten it. It more proof that it's real because of that. Like you said, if you were faking it, you would have made it one layer. This wasn't faked. It was electronically uploaded to the internet to show you birther idiots. If it were on flat scan, you would have doubted that too. There's no convincing people like you. Even if you saw it in person, you'd still think it a fake, because you're stuck on stupid.

[smokeyriverband]

@Jonim40 Jonim, do you want to know the truth or do you just want to throw crap against the wall? This WAS NOT done on an OCR program. OCR does not create 9 or more layers. Since you brought up the layers...let me explain. When I create a fake I also create them in layers. The layers are a "history" of what was done to create the final image. At least I had the common sense to reduce my fakes down to ONE layer. Obama's BC creator wasn't even that smart..pretty dumb actually.

[Jonim40]

@smokeyriverband Yes, it does. The original BC was not on the current security paper, its scanned through a document reader, and OCR scanner, onto the security paper. Further confusing the recognition of letters and numbers. Hawaii only does electronic records. The reason all those layers were visible was because they made a special scan, and DIRECTLY uploaded it to the internet. The one that was shown, way back when, was the OFFICIAL BC of Hawaii. They don't do "long forms'

[Jonim40]

@smokeyriverband Well, if you never heard of it, then you really are a moron. It's called OCR or Optical character recognition. It's a SCANNER that recognizes "characters" like "letters" and "numbers" if it CAN'T recognize "characters" as letters or numbers, it takes a snap-shot of the part of the document. It's used in....WAIT for it. Government offices, so it the scanned documents can be searched. Although, some have higher tech equipment depending on the department, and its uses.

[smokeyriverband]

@Jonim40 omg, I've never heard so much bull in two paragraphs in my life. You obviously have no clue about anything you just wrote. "when it passed through a document reader"?????? Are talking about the photo of the original document that was scanned in?????? If you have a "reader" that changes font and creates about two dozen other oddities then YOU NEED to buy a new "reader". (we call it a SCANNER) Your explanation is a really bad joke. sorry.