A short history of the evolution of Jesus Christ, the greatest scientific theory ever developed.
http://www.eoht.info/page/Christianity
Over 87% of the world believes in one of the various precipitates of this theory: life, death, morality, choice, free will, and purpose, among others. See the following page on comparative mythology and modern religion for further reading and references:
http://www.eoht.info/page/Comparative+mythology+and+religion
@sirmrdevil Then how did they get it? Sail over to the Americas and bring it back but forget to tell anyone that there are gigantic continents to the west?
TheResidentSkeptic 3 weeks ago
@TheResidentSkeptic they could have had corn but not grown it ?
sirmrdevil 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@TheResidentSkeptic I may be off on the corn issue; the issue seems to stem from the King James Bible, wherein it states that “when Jacob saw there was corn in Egypt” (Genesis 42), but in other Bibles (NIV, NLT, NASB) thereafter was translated as “grain in Egypt”.
The Passion of Christ is a verbatim rewrite of the Passion of Osiris, just as is Brahma/Abraham a rewrite of the Myth of Ra born of Nun. You can certainly exist in denial if you wish as that is your prerogative.
HumanChemistry101 1 month ago
@HumanChemistry101 I have multiple books on comparative religion. This is now the third time I'm going to say it: Correlation does not imply causation.
Also, this doesn't change the fact that the EGYPTIANS DID NOT HAVE CORN!
TheResidentSkeptic 1 month ago
@TheResidentSkeptic Read the comparative mythology link in the drop menu and the six main points of overlap between Abraham and Brahma and next time you post come back with some sense in your head.
HumanChemistry101 1 month ago
@HumanChemistry101 I suggest you do some reading of history books rather than conspiracy theories.
TheResidentSkeptic 1 month ago
@HumanChemistry101 As I stated earlier, correlation does not imply causation. I know all about the "Out of Egypt" theory promoted mostly by D.M. Murdock. It has failed to hold any ground in the historical community because it's simply wrong.
Trying to imply that the names of Abraham and Bhrama have anything to do with Ra by association of the letters "ra" is as silly as D. M. Murdock trying to argue that Jesus is a son god because son sounds like sun.
TheResidentSkeptic 1 month ago
@TheResidentSkeptic You would be better off doing some reading and research in the books rather than to argue with me, and direct me to Evid3nc3's videos (with he bases on Karen Armstong's A History of God, which I have already read), etc.
Start with the following fact (which took me several years to track down): the Ab-ra-hamic faiths and B-ra-hamic faiths of the common origin of the myth of Ra. Later.
HumanChemistry101 1 month ago
@HumanChemistry101 Oh, and Osiris is the God of the afterlife, not of corn (wheat) however there is a tradition called the Myth of Osiris and Isis which symbolizes the death and re-birth of the wheat during the winter-spring months. Nepit was the egyptian god of wheat.
TheResidentSkeptic 1 month ago
@HumanChemistry101 Well if it's on Google it's got to be true...
The Egyptians did not have corn, they had wheat, which they called "Corn". Keep in mind that corn evolved from a species of wheat, in the new world.
We already know where Christianity comes from... Judaism. And Judaism comes from the Babylonians, in particular their war god. See here: watch?v=MlnnWbkMlbg
There is no common origin between the ancient traditions, Abrahamic faiths and eastern religions.
TheResidentSkeptic 1 month ago