Quantum Canine

Kevin Behan and Trisha Selbach discuss Natural Dog Training on television show Quantum Canine

Category:

Pets & Animals

Tags:

• natural dog training
• kevin behan
• trisha selbach
• pushing
• prey drive
• physics
• evolution

[quantumcanine]

As long as you stay tuned.

[quantumcanine]

They apparently mean enough to attract your attention.

[quantumcanine]

Our understanding of energy is incomplete, but we study it in terms of the immediate-moment rather than projecting human thoughts such as dominance and therefore our understanding deepens. But modern biology/behavior is a theology because it doesn't study animals in terms of the immediate-moment. So I repeat the question, why does a dog, and only a dog, without training, sit for a cookie?

[quantumcanine]

If there are several definitions for emotion, then it means that emotion is misunderstood. Many years ago when physics had several definitions for electromagnetism, it meant that it wsnt' known that electricity and magnetism were both aspects of the same phenomenon. Also, if evolution has no direction, are you willing or able to state as to what is the purpose of an animal's behavior?

[quantumcanine]

Which one do you reference?

[quantumcanine]

Fear is not emotion. I suppose you have a definition for emotion. If so you should publish a book because mainstream science doesn't yet have one.

[PrometheansFire]

Millan is a bigger idiot who subscribes to ancient beliefs about wolves and dogs that have been disproven long ago. His methods are often cruel and ineffective.

[PrometheansFire]

That is simply stupid. The belief in a flat earth never had anything to do with science.

[sangster111]

I do have to ask, again just out of curiosity. Do you support Cesar Millan's model of behavior and training? I only ask because I noticed you had a few of his videos on your channel.

[sangster111]

There was a time when science believed the earth was flat.

[PrometheansFire]

It's easy to criticize because he is so often wrong. If he got a few things correctly and used accurate descriptions it would be a lot harder. I'm talking about ideas, not people. If ideas are wrong, they are wrong and you don't need to check credentials if someone is debunking your claim that the earth is flat. That's just another method to derail - a red herring.

[sangster111]

Might I ask your background in this subject matter? It's very easy to criticize and poke holes in theories of someone who is actually putting their thoughts out there, open for criticism. I only think that's fair. Plus I'm just curious.

I do think it's a bit unfair to criticize Kevin's training methods considering his vast experience with dogs and dog behavior. You can criticize his theories if you like, but his experience and the positive effect he has on dogs can't be argued.

[PrometheansFire]

No your opinions are worthless, but others not schooled in critical thinking and unfamiliar with science my be taken in by such falsehoods. They and the dogs they own and will own mean enough to me.