Oulton park F3 83 race Senna Brundle

Oulton park f3 83

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Motor
• Sport

[115press]

Thank you . Sorry I only speak English !!

[theiceman099]

What impresses me about Senna is his concern for his fellow racers safety. Like in this video he quickly gets out of the car to see if Brundle is ok and he helps out. Also like that time he stopped on track to help another driver who had badly crashed. Belgium I think it was, anyone know?

[RothmansRenaultF1]

Belgium 1992: He stopped to help Eric Comas after his heavy crash.

[1oktay1]

thecolinchapman is a son of a bitch who hates senna. this asshole is problably a michael schumacher fan

[TheColinChapman]

@xcruzrr6 Comparing Senna to a school kid seems very strange to me. And I think his disqualification @ Suzuka in '89 WAS justified. Not for cutting the chicane (this was the official reason), but for being push-started by the track marshalls. and please don't forget that even a win in Suzuka in '89 wouldn't have won him the title. He would have needed to win in Adelaide, too, but there he crashed into Martin Brundle (again).

[xcruzrr6]

@TheColinChapman Ok I get that but, what would you have him do? If you simply go by that logic his DQ in 89 would have been justified but we both know it wasn't. If you get beat up or teased everyday at school and no one cares to do anything about it, are you wrong for punching the kid in the face or coming up with a mom joke?  Yea...on paper but, it's a good feeling knowing that kid wont F with you again. Walking the high road could have lost him the title in this case.

[TheColinChapman]

@xcruzrr6 I'm saying that a person who stands up to corruption by being illegal himself , is unacceptable. WEhat Prost did to Senna in 89, was deceit, what Senna did to Prost in 90, was deceit. Both is despicable, and one mischief does does not justify the next one. Senna was good enough to beat everyone by fair means, unfortunately he did not have the discipline to do so.

[xcruzrr6]

@TheColinChapman So what you're saying is a person who stands up to corruption is not admirable? What would you rather him do? Race it out and risk Prost doing the exact same thing he did the year before? How admirable would that be? Do you not admire the people who stand out in the cold and rain to protest the corrupt banks that ruined the world? Instead of picket signs, Senna packed the rope and duct tape.

[TheColinChapman]

@xcruzrr6 his 'quest' against the 'corrupt politicians' included arbitrary law. How can one be admired for such a thing?

[xcruzrr6]

@TheColinChapman nah, just chillin homie. lol

[TheColinChapman]

@xcruzrr6 no, but what about you? :-))

[xcruzrr6]

@longde Senna dirty vs "fair" Prost? LOL someone needs to do some research before they talk

[xcruzrr6]

@nachospole1 We all know why he did that. Prost used underhanded politics to his favor in 89. In 1990 Senna got pole. Then, mysteriously, pole was moved to the dirty side of the track. On top of that Prost had the FIA president in his back pocket. This is why I don't feel sorry for Prost. Senna finally said enough is enough. He said before the race, he was going for it no matter the consequence. I admire him for fighting against corrupt, fraternizing, politicians.that ruin the sport.