super pi (1mb) 4200+ 2x 512kb cache

33 seconds due to my shity half meg cache.

still its fast enought for what i want it for.
this is no problem for a processor with a 1mb cache or over.

it will get about 30 seconds when not recording.

plz comment.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• super
• pi
• overclocking
• overclock
• bongman4ghz
• underclocking
• ati
• nvidia
• intel
• amd

[15eman]

intel q9450 clocked to 3.4ghz

[bongman4ghz]

thats pretty fast.

considering you have a quad.

cheers man.

[15eman]

hahah true but your time is considerably well when i was running my amd 5400+x2 i wasnt getting as fast as you i dont think. keep up the good work.

[bongman4ghz]

did you have a brisbane.

no one can expect a 65nm chip to be faster than a 90nm chip.

i would think about a phenom mate.

the phenoms will shit all over intels chips.

thanks for the comment man.

[15eman]

thats pretty quick my processor gets 12 seconds.

[bongman4ghz]

what processor are you running.

[thefearlesstiger]

heh u beat me by jus 1 at same speed with my e2180 when your not recording :p

[uut0]

my pc tells me i have -1 real memory lol and that -258318336 of that is used lol

[Davidopoland]

@15eman

i got Q6600 3.3 and having 15

[smercer1000]

My i7 does 8.954 seconds @ 4410mhz with 12GB of ram running @ 1890mhz with 6-6-6-4 timings. For screenshots or pics PM me.

[Neosferaku]

Form factor doesn't make chips faster.