Part 11: M-theory

Apparently the CERN facility could have killed us all.

This is ooollllddddd, The Large Hadron Collider is done.

you can only break something down so far, somethings cant be answered (Why does a person fall in love?) i think its time to look in another direction, or maybe i should say at life and the universe from another perspective.. Merry Christmas to everyone....

11-D / String Theory ?

It began in 1907 when Minkowski tried to understand
SRT using 4D space
Nobody knows what Minkowski negative space really is
Trying to understand it, Kaluza in 1921 created 5D space
Nobody knows what it is too
So
If we don't know what 1+1 = 2
how can we know what 5 + 4 = 9 ?

And if we don't know what is 4-D how can we
understand SRT and another 10-D, 11-D/ String Theory ?

I Propose a Gyroscopic version of M-Theory. with 2-3 brane universes. with length, depth, height, time and velocity. 5D + 5D in ?perpendicular? orbiting brane. the 11th Dimension is A) the 3rd brane only effects the inner 2 on it's horizontal axis. B) distortion of particles passing through branes. or a combo of A&B. this would allow for S-particles if they exist, gravity with or without gravitons and faster then light travel.

@Eudaimonlife Ultimately, what is seen with these technology is just from another point of view. I think it is impossible to gather all these points of view and form a complete picture. More complete, maybe, but never complete. Nothing is absolute according to relativistic physics.

To further elaborate that maybe they should "look at whats there instead of whats not". Could they take the particles that are produced at the point of impact and collide those particles or maybe break down the formula further to reach a solution. Again, I'm no rocket scientist but hopefully i could get a response from someone of greater knowledge of this theory to explain to me why this suggestion wouldn't work. TO THINK IS NOT DANGEROUS......NOT ACCEPTING CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM IS.

ok, my comments were lame.....and i'm not afraid to admit it....just trying to make a point that they should use a different approach in solving the equation since there has been several collisions and did not find the disappearing S particle.
I'm sure they're pretty smart though and will figure it out sooner or later. Very interesting.

That should have read....."disappearing G particle"