Woo! Less than 3 hours long video on the first try!...or maybe I'm just slipping in my old age...oh well. Yes, this was extreme sarcasm, if that wasn't apparent. I'm actually quite perturbed, but not really surprised, that it was upheld. I was planning on making a vlog about it until.........
I had a feeling there'd be some wonderful new dog vomit from him. Really tried not to mention him but it kinda got out anyway.
Here's the court ruling document:
http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/07D0096P.pdf
And here's the document on when they tried to appeal to the third circuit:
http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/071461p.pdf
"hate crimes against homosexuals, not overall hate crimes furthermore this is 09 not 07. use updated statistics. *SIGH*"
"On top of that the Matthew Shepard case in the 70's, wow what horrible statistics and sources for your arguments." don't blame your own stupidity on me, that's on you.
The charges were dropped, and when they filed lawsuit they were dismissed because it was determined that they did something wrong. I pointed this out a few times and I can do it again if you want
Take care!
OneWingedAniki 2 years ago
The only part that may have sounded like it happened in the 70s was when he was born, especially when I read out his birth and death (December 1, 1976 October 12, 1998), so that's epic fail on your behalf for not paying attention and not verifying your claims before making yourself look like an ignorant ass.
OneWingedAniki 2 years ago
First it sounded like you said it happened in the 70's second everything else were epic fails on your behalf, not mine.
They were doing nothing wrong and the charges were dropped.
BYE!!!
Blistering idiot, lol
Krazie316 2 years ago
has the credibility or capacity to call someone else a blistering idiot.
I mean, really, what blisters and what the hell are you doing staring at my body in the videos that closely to make such a call? Pervert...
OneWingedAniki 2 years ago
Don't really think someone who's stated the matthew shepard incident happened in the 70s, has 2009's hate crime statistics reports even though the year was 4 months in at the time, not comprehending 2 clips where protesters were not being denied their free speech, and didn't even fully research his outfest 2004 protesters argument before blabbering on and on about it
OneWingedAniki 2 years ago
eezyone, arguing with this blistering idiot will give you a headache, let the haters hate and masterbate in their tired poor lives
Krazie316 2 years ago
Actually I'd be quite happy and gleeful with the failure of what you think defines a marriage. And, yes, it makes every excuse because it further proves that just because you may not like their marriages, by your own definition they ARE married yet Christians seem not to be up in arms about those. They tend to silently accept them. True love and true happiness is not bounded by what goes in where, and you're a very sad individual if you think to the contrary. Take care!
OneWingedAniki 2 years ago
Sexual deviants have all the same rights that everyone else has. You're pretty sad and angry about the failure of marriage. The selfcentered and immature people who are unqualified to be married makes no excuse for homosexuals to try to sanctify their disordered and fallen relationships and call it marriage.
you're video is honest but you're just displaying your lack of understanding of true love and true happiness and your lack of understanding of God. Good luck in your mockery.
eezyone 2 years ago