Zakir Naik vs William Campbell-Quran and Bible (pt 6 0f 10)

Complete series of Debates 4 Segments - Each Segments is 10 Parts.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• islam
• debate
• christian
• william
• campbell
• zakir
• naik

[systematic91]

i m waiting for the moment when zakir will get up and will say brother posed good questions..then domination will begin....

[caprihoney51]

its funny to hear campbell speaking rubbish when he could clearly speak about the errors in bible.......he was given 22 clear errors of bible y couldnt he clear them if bible is considered a true word of God.............hahahaha no book can stand infront of glorious quran

[thetruth12345able]

1:06 Everyone in the audience is waiting for Zakir Naik to come forward and respond to William Campbell..... THE DOMINATION PART

[TheRationalizer]

@caprihoney51

Both talkers are guilty of the same thing. Being objectively critical about their opponent's religion whilst subjectively excusing errors in their own.

Talking of scientific error. The Quran says that Jinn are made of smokeless fire. People in Muhammad's time though that fire was an element, whereas in reality it is a process. You cannot make something out of a process, it is a 100% clear scientific error in the Quran.

[bm773]

Ebenezer Scrooge, I mean William Campbell is soooo boring. I am not saying he is smart or dumb. He is just not fit to be a a good debater. Put a brotha to sleep. At least Zakir Naik can keep a crowd on their feet.

[romalondra]

Dr campbell is a great researcher and a senior brother to me in the Faith and as such i respect him appropriately for that , nevertheless , for a debate of this nature, i'm sure someone such as Dr Josh Macdowell would actually have been more suited to this style of debating and the organising society should invite him instead in future to discuss publicly, with Dr Zakir. Dr Josh could give a better presentation of the Truth to our dearly beloved Muslim friends in this type of debate.

[lilmisselly57]

@caprihoney51 al Injil was also sent from Allah and some parts of the Bible are still probably words of Allah but not the whole thing, so lets not insult the whole book cuz there might be words of Allah left in it somewhere ...

[RippIemagne]

@oldham287

You should believe in the truth and merit of a religion after you hear the facts. Not before because you'll just change the facts to fit the theory rather than the theory to fit the facts.

[RippIemagne]

@oldham287

Who says I haven't studied it?

My point is that you're poisoning the well. You're putting the carriage in front of the horse. That is to say, lets say you and I debated the Bible and the Qu'ran. Do you automatically win because your side is the side of "truth". If that's the case, does a Muslim losing a debate invalidate Islam across the board?

[RippIemagne]

@oldham287

So, truth is to be found in the Qu'ran because the Qu'ran is truth? That's some nice, circular logic you've got going there. Too bad your logic is illogical.

Yes, Naik is a very good ORATOR. But as demonstrated by Ali Sina and Sam Shamoun, that's all he is and all of his claims are riff raff.