9/11/01 Worth A Watch Part Two

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
45,392
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 7, 2007

Some clips and an interview by David Schippers the chief investigative counsel for the house judiciary committee impeachment hearing of Bill Clinton. He was also responsible for the downfall of the Mafia in Chicago. He would seem to be a very credible witness and someone who would have nothing to gain from any deception or spreading of disinformation.
In this interview he claims that he was given inside information well before 9/11 that "arabs" were planning large attacks on Manhattan. Furthermore he states that the warnings he gave to the Attorney General and lots of other high ranking officials including members of Congress were ignored and they "didnt want to know".
Did they know about the impending attacks and want to keep everything hush hush so that they could deal with it in secret. Or, did certain high ranking officials want the attacks to go ahead as a pretext for invading Afgahnistan and Iraq under the cover of Usama Bin Laden and terrorism. Watch all parts and decide for yourself.

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (talibanfanofsaddam)

  • Why did the buildings fall at near free fall speed? Without the use of explosives or thermite and/or thermate you cannot answer this question, that is unless the laws of physics cease to exist the universe.

    I think this is the key question that the truth movement should be asking. The near freefall collapse of both buildings points to the use of some form of explosives, this means more time was required and more people, go figure!

  • Who I support is my own fucking business you fucking moron so fuck you, and while Im at it freedom for Osama too!!

  • What does SANJAYA mean??

  • Thanks for your comment by the way :)

  • No, I dont believe the moon landing was a hoax. I have done a lot of reading on this subject and I see no evidence of any hoax. Much of the journey to the moon is down to the laws of physics. Providing the technology is there then there would be no problem getting there. Theories about the radiation belts is unfounded and damage through solar rays has been explained by NASA in the past, so nope the moon landings happend.

  • This video isnt another tabloid youtube vid and wasnt thought up. You can download the whole film for free using bittorrent or goto google video and type in 911 alex jones. I dont mind anyone leaving comments but please use your brain before posting anything as you may end up looking like a dumb ass.

Top Comments

  • After watching many post 9/11 truth-based documentaries,after reading report after report that points out what is REALLY going on, I am physically sick over all of this. There are so mant lies,so many half-truths,so many high ranking officials involved in all of this.All for the establishment of the NWO.Bush is a lap dog to NATO and European money and he is WILLING and ABLE to sell this country for the enrichment of a very select few.Say goodbye to freedom.Say hello to marshall law and the NWO.

  • Which burnt out immediately after the crash, which is why you only see grey oxygen-starved smoke. Marvin Bush was in charge of WTC security, why did he remove the bomb-sniffing dogs exactly 5 days before 9/11? How naive are you? A HUGE building turning to dust from FIRE?

see all

All Comments (84)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Where's Bin Laden? Oh that's right ,we let him get away at Tora Bora. Gotta have a boogieman so we can keep the fear factor high to manipulate the masses.

  • You have your facts backwards... thousands including firemen and policemen heard the bombs and seen them, they point out at which floors they went off and everything...which news do u watch? No bldg. is coming down free fall except a demo job, the thermite was found at ground zero, and bldg.7 fell(demo'd) with no plane so....HELLO

  • architects aint qualified at demolition. in fact when they design a building nearly all of the nuts and bolt calculations will be performed by the consultant structural engineer not the architect. i think youre telling lies to be honest......

  • you are talking out a hole in your bum

  • youre not an architect. structural engineers would be better placed to judge whether it was controlled or not. the witness list ran to tens of thousands and less than a hundred thought they heard explosions. even a car crash can sound like an explosion. to someone who doesnt really (but thinks they do) know what theyre talking about. it contradicts fuck all of the laws of physics. if your walls suddenly disappeared and your ceiling fell, could your floor withstand the impact and weight of floor?

  • what waz the point of this

  • RandleEl11- you make it seem like it was an inside job do you need me to slow it down for  you. You ran five sentences together. Ok, you must be an english teacher correct. All you inside job people, need JOBS!!

  • Your comment makes no sense. First, you say that it was an inside job and then you make it sound like anyone who thinks so is a traitor. Also, you ran 5 separate sentences together.

    If you are calling me a traitor, I am the exact opposite of a traitor. I will not move out of this country. This is my country and I believe in everything that our founding fathers built this country upon. I am trying to help restore this country.

    I'm the exact opposite of a hippie and I am not an anarchist.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more