YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Mr. Fancy Pants

injuryboard injuryboard·38 videos
50
22,431
Like     Dislike 7

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like injuryboard's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike injuryboard's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add injuryboard's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Jul 11, 2007

Mr. Fancy Pants is a first-cut of a longer more in-depth short film that looks into the realities of the American Civil Justice System and "Tort Reform." The project, that will ultimately become a series of films, is being produced by InjuryBoard.com.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (37)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Michael Schreyer

    I do not agree that any efforts to overcome the public image of that case will bear any fruit whatsoever. It is urban legend. It will not die a natural death.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Michael Schreyer's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Michael Schreyer's comment.
    in reply to nick40 (Show the comment)
  • nick40

    we're very familiar with John Edwards' strategy with his juries and David Ball's ideas about the McDonald's case. And for the most part we agree, when it comes to trial tactics.

    But in terms of public dialogue, completely ignoring the case or lying about the facts can't really be the answer.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nick40's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nick40's comment.
    in reply to Michael Schreyer (Show the comment)
  • Michael Schreyer

    The argument about McDonald's is a waste of time. You aren't going to undue the myth that McDonand's got ripped off. So be smart. Say of course that case was a scam by one lawyer and your cases aren't that kind. Explain to your next jury that unlike the McDonald's hot coffee case, your client was very seriously injured.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Michael Schreyer's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Michael Schreyer's comment.
  • jfur76

    Actually, you missed the point. Coffee is not dangerous enough to cause these kind of injuries. If it is, then the person who made the coffee did something wrong.

    Your statement that "any coffee when you get it will severely burn you" is false. Period. You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own reality.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jfur76's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jfur76's comment.
    in reply to laallaal75 (Show the comment)
  • laallaal75

    Wow it appears you missed my point, coffee is dangerous, though not as dangerous as a blowtorch people can expect it to be steaming hot, like people expect blowtorches to be extremely hot, and steaming hot liquid is dangerous, maybe you haven't caught on to that little fact of life yet.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate laallaal75's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate laallaal75's comment.
    in reply to jfur76 (Show the comment)
  • jfur76

    The problem with you analysis is that coffee is FOOD. It is not an inherently dangerous product like a blowtorch, nor is it reasonable for a consumer to expect that the product would have that danger. Some food can be dangerous, like the danger of biting into a pearl when you eat a clam. Consumers know there might be a pearl in a clam, so it's up to the consumer to be careful. Consumers don't have to expect that there is a blowtorch-equivalent in their coffee.

    McD needs to be responsible.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jfur76's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate jfur76's comment.
    in reply to laallaal75 (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later